Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Priority setting in the REACH system.

Sven Ove Hansson1, Christina Rudén

  • 1Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Philosophy, Stockholm, Sweden.

Toxicological Sciences : an Official Journal of the Society of Toxicology
|December 13, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Chemical regulation needs better priority setting for data acquisition. A multicriteria system including chemical properties and initial testing is proposed to improve current methods, which rely heavily on production volume.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Methylchloroisothiazolinone and Methylisothiazolinone 10 Years After Regulation: A Case Story of Liquid Soaps and Shampoos.

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same author

Mapping of Former Strategies and Future Needs for Regulatory Prevention of Skin Sensitization: Cosmetic Products.

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same author

Chemical Mixture Exposures and Their Effects on Sensitisation and Elicitation Responses: A Systematic Review.

Contact dermatitis·2025
Same author

Trialability.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2025
Same author

Mapping chemicals across EU's legal frameworks towards a 'one substance, one assessment' approach.

Environment international·2025
Same author

Legislation and Current Practices Concerning Risk Assessment of Skin Sensitizers in the European Union: A Comparative and Survey Study.

Contact dermatitis·2025

Area of Science:

  • Environmental toxicology
  • Chemical risk assessment
  • Regulatory science

Background:

  • Data gaps in toxicological and ecotoxicological information for chemicals pose a challenge for regulation.
  • Current European chemical regulation uses novelty and production volume for priority setting.
  • The proposed Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) system prioritizes production volume and QSAR modeling, removing novelty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify weaknesses in current and proposed chemical priority-setting systems.
  • To propose a more robust multicriteria system for prioritizing chemical data acquisition.
  • To advocate for further research in toxicological and decision-theoretical approaches for validated priority-setting mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Critique of existing administrative priority-setting criteria (novelty, production volume).
  • Proposal of a multicriteria decision-making framework for chemical testing prioritization.
  • Identification of key additional criteria: chemical properties, tiered testing results, and voluntary testing incentives.

Main Results:

  • Current and proposed priority-setting systems have significant limitations.
  • A multicriteria approach offers a more comprehensive and effective method for data acquisition prioritization.
  • Integration of chemical properties, tiered testing, and voluntary testing can enhance regulatory efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed REACH system's reliance on production volume is insufficient for effective chemical regulation.
  • A multicriteria system is essential for robust priority setting in chemical safety assessment.
  • Further research is required to develop and validate advanced priority-setting mechanisms for chemicals.

Related Experiment Videos