Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Judgments of change and proportion in graphical perception.

J G Hollands1, I Spence

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Human Factors
|June 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Line and bar graphs best show data change, while pie charts excel at proportion. Graph design impacts how quickly and accurately we perceive visual information.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Simple Approximation For Random Rankings Stress Values.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

THE DETERMINATION OF THE UNDERLYING DIMENSIONALITY OF AN EMPIRICALLY OBTAINED MATRIX OF PROXIMITIES.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

A TABLE OF EXPECTED STRESS VALUES FOR RANDOM RANKINGS IN NONMETRIC MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Effect of chronic exposure to lead on GABA binding in developing rat brain.

Neurochemistry international·2010
Same author

Long-term potentiation saturation in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia·2008
Same author

Role of inhibition in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia·2008

Area of Science:

  • Data visualization
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human-computer interaction

Background:

  • Effective graphical displays are crucial for data interpretation.
  • Understanding how different graph types affect perception is essential for clear communication.
  • Previous research indicates variations in how humans process visual data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and speed of judging data change and proportion across different graph types.
  • To investigate the influence of graph design on perceptual efficiency.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing graphical display design.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted where subjects judged change and proportion from various graphs (line, bar, pie, tiered bar, divided bar).
  • Performance metrics included judgment speed and accuracy.
  • The presence or absence of a graduated scale was a key variable.

Main Results:

  • Line and bar graphs facilitated quicker and more accurate judgments of change compared to pie or tiered bar graphs.
  • This difference was more pronounced with smaller rates of change.
  • Pie charts and divided bar graphs enabled faster and more accurate proportion judgments, especially without a graduated scale.
  • Results align with the proximity compatibility principle.

Conclusions:

  • Perception of change is more direct with line and bar graphs.
  • Perception of proportion is more direct with pie charts and divided bar graphs.
  • These findings offer insights for designing more effective and intuitive graphical displays.

Related Experiment Videos