Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating the laws defining blindness.

¹Southern California College of Optometry, Fullerton 92631.

Journal of the American Optometric Association

|June 1, 1992

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Scintillation light detection in the 6-m drift-length ProtoDUNE Dual Phase liquid argon TPC.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2022

Same author

Prospects for beyond the Standard Model physics searches at the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment: DUNE Collaboration.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2021

Same author

Osteoporosis treatment and 10 years' oestrogen receptor+ breast cancer outcome in postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2018

Same author

[Unexpected adverse events of immunotherapies in non-small cell lung cancer: About 2 cases].

Revue de pneumologie clinique·2017

Same author

Factors associated with an increased risk of vertebral fracture in monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance.

Blood cancer journal·2015

Same author

Fracture incidence after 3 years of aromatase inhibitor therapy.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2014

The legal blindness definition from 1935 is outdated and requires revision. Addressing issues in this definition is crucial for managing visual impairment programs and funding effectively.

Area of Science:

Ophthalmology
Public Health Policy

Background:

The current legal definition of blindness was established in 1935 and has not been updated.
An aging population is projected to increase the prevalence of visual impairment.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the historical context and shortcomings of the current legal definition of blindness.
To compare the US definition with international standards.
To advocate for the revision of the legal blindness law.

Main Methods:

Historical review of the legal definition of blindness.
Comparative analysis of legal blindness definitions across different countries.

Main Results:

The 1935 law contains inherent problems due to its age and lack of updates.

Related Experiment Videos

International comparisons reveal inconsistencies and potential areas for improvement in the US definition.

Conclusions:

The current definition of legal blindness is inadequate for contemporary needs.
Revision of the law is essential for equitable program administration, funding distribution, and ensuring adequate care for individuals with visual impairments.