Related Experiment Videos
Manipulation in close relationships: five personality factors in interactional context
1Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1346.
Journal of Personality
|June 1, 1992
Summary
This study identifies twelve manipulation tactics in relationships and links them to the Big Five personality factors. Personality traits significantly predict the use of specific manipulation strategies in interpersonal dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Personality Psychology
Background:
- Close relationships involve complex social interactions.
- Understanding manipulation tactics is crucial for relationship dynamics.
- The link between personality and manipulative behaviors requires empirical investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify distinct manipulation tactics employed in close relationships.
- To examine the generalizability and specificity of these tactics across relationship types (mates, friends, parents).
- To determine the association between the Big Five personality dimensions and the utilization of manipulation tactics.
Main Methods:
- Factor analysis was used to identify twelve manipulation tactics from two different data sources.
- The Big Five personality factors were assessed using self-reports, spouse reports, and independent interviewer assessments.
- Data triangulation across multiple sources enhanced the reliability of personality assessments.
Main Results:
- Twelve distinct manipulation tactics were empirically identified, including Charm, Reason, Coercion, Silent Treatment, Debasement, Regression, Responsibility Invocation, Reciprocity, Monetary Reward, Pleasure Induction, Social Comparison, and Hardball.
- Significant correlations were found between personality factors and specific tactics: Surgency (Coercion, Responsibility Invocation), Desurgency (Debasement), Agreeableness (Pleasure Induction), Disagreeableness (Coercion), Conscientiousness (Reason), Emotional Instability (Regression), and Intellect-Openness (Reason).
- Tactical deployment showed variations across relationship types, indicating both general and specific patterns.
Conclusions:
- The Big Five personality factors are coherently linked to the use of specific manipulation tactics in close relationships.
- Understanding these personality-tactic links offers insights into social interaction patterns.
- These findings contribute to the understanding of interpersonal influence and relationship functioning.