Private and collective interests; conflicts and solutions: the central theme of current thinking in evolutionary...

The statement made by the population geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky (1973): "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution", is often quoted as a crucially important generalization on the nature of biology. I am inclined to consider as equally important the statement: "Nothing in Evolutionary Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Conflicts between Parts and Systems." This generalization takes account of the dynamic nature of biological phenomena, but also of the fact that the study of transitions from autonomous units to cooperative systems has become one of the most exciting and scientifically rewarding enterprises in all of organismic biology. The problems encountered and the speculations generated in the course of this enterprise will be either of the more unit-centered or of the more system-centered type, most biologists tending to lean towards one or the other. This explains why evolutionary biology is fraught with so many antagonistic attitudes and polarizing points of view. In this essay I want specifically to draw attention to and discuss the following issues which in recent years have polarized biologists: the dual nature of genes; the logic of Hamilton's rule; the relationship between kin selection, signalling networks and systemic manipulation; the semantic problem of progress in evolution; and the evolutionary consequences of the vastly differing time scales over which genotypic and phenotypic information processing occurs in higher animals.