Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative methods in developmental biology.

M K Richardson1, J E Jeffery, M I Coates

  • 1Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, Leiden University, The Netherlands. richardson@rulsfb.leidenuniv.nl

Zoology (Jena, Germany)
|December 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Convergent evolution of pain-inducing defensive venom components in spitting cobras.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2021
Same author

Measuring thigmotaxis in larval zebrafish.

Behavioural brain research·2011
Same author

Phylotypic stage theory.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

Analysis of cardiac development in the turtle Emys orbicularis (Testudines: Emidydae) using 3-D computer modeling from histological sections.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2010
Same author

Sequencing and genomic annotation of the chicken (Gallus gallus) Hox clusters, and mapping of evolutionarily conserved regions.

Cytogenetic and genome research·2007
Same author

Symposium on neural crest development.

Journal of anatomy·2006
Same journal

A spectrum of speculums: Testing adaptive hypotheses for male speculum coloration in male Brown-Throated sloths (Bradypus variegatus).

Zoology (Jena, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy to explore the functional anatomy of skeletal appendages in migratory and resident birds.

Zoology (Jena, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Morphological conservatism and natural history in two sympatric Amerotyphlops species (Serpentes: Typhlopidae) from the Atlantic Forest of Northeastern Brazil.

Zoology (Jena, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Is developmental instability sex-specific? Case study in two spiny lizards with different reproductive modes.

Zoology (Jena, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Diversity of tarsal attachment structures in Mantodea (Insecta) includes two distinct attachment pad micro-morphologies.

Zoology (Jena, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Getting a grip on the squid hectocotylus: Sexually dimorphic glandular system underlies spermatophore transfer in Doryteuthis pleii (Blainville, 1823).

Zoology (Jena, Germany)·2026
See all related articles

Applying phylogenetic methods to developmental data is crucial for understanding evolution and development. This research explores the concepts, challenges, and solutions for integrating evolutionary divergence into developmental biology studies.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Phylogenetics

Background:

  • Phylogenetic frameworks are increasingly vital in biology but underutilized in developmental studies.
  • Developmental biology traditionally focuses on conserved mechanisms, often using phenetic similarity rather than evolutionary divergence.
  • Existing cross-species comparisons in development typically employ phenetic approaches, not phylogenetic reconstruction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply comparative and phylogenetic methods to developmental data.
  • To examine the underlying concepts, potential difficulties, and solutions for this integration.
  • To highlight the value of phylogenetic methodologies in developmental research.

Main Methods:

  • Examining concepts of phylogenetic frameworks in developmental biology.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussing difficulties in defining developmental characters and equivalent stages across species.
  • Addressing issues of phylogenetic non-independence in developmental data.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified three key areas of difficulty: character definition, stage equivalency, and phylogenetic non-independence.
    • Highlighted the limited use of phylogenetic methodologies (e.g., synapomorphies) in current developmental studies.
    • Demonstrated the potential value of phylogenetic approaches for evolutionary developmental biology.

    Conclusions:

    • Integrating phylogenetic methodology into developmental data analysis is necessary.
    • Overcoming challenges in character definition and stage equivalency is fundamental for this integration.
    • Phylogenetic approaches are essential for research linking evolution and development.