Feeding in flow extremes: dependence of cirrus form on wave-exposure in four barnacle species

Wave-exposure influences the form of many organisms. Curiously, the impact of flow extremes on feeding structures has received little attention. Barnacles extend feather-like legs to feed, and prior work revealed a highly precise association between leg length and water velocity in one species. To assess the generality of this flow-dependence, we quantified variation in four leg traits (ramus length, ramus diameter, seta length, and intersetal spacing) in four intertidal barnacles (Balanus glandula, Chthamalus dalli, Semibalanus cariosus, Pollicipes polymerus) over a wave-exposure gradient in the North-Eastern Pacific. All species exhibited a negative allometric relation between leg length and body mass. Proportionally longer feeding legs may permit smaller barnacles to avoid lower flow and particle flux associated with boundary layers. Although coefficients of allometry did not vary with wave-exposure, form differences among wave-exposures were substantial. Depending on the species, acorn barnacles of the same size from protected shores had feeding legs that were 37-80% longer and 18-25% thinner, and setae that were 36-50% longer and up to 25% more closely spaced, than those from exposed shores. Differences were less pronounced for the gooseneck barnacle, P. polymerus. Moreover, in situ water velocity explained an impressive percentage of overall leg-length variation: 92% in B. glandula, 67% in C. dalli, 91% in S. cariosus, and 92% in P. polymerus. Clearly, both size and shape of barnacle feeding legs respond to local flow conditions. This response appears widespread--across two orders of thoracican barnacles, Pedunculata and Sessilia, and two superfamilies of acorn barnacles (Balanoidea and Chthamaloidea)--and likely adaptive. Longer rami and setae would yield a larger feeding area in low flow, whereas shorter, stouter rami with shorter setae would be less vulnerable to damage in high flow. Finally, the proportionally most variable species was abundant in the widest range of habitats, suggesting that increased plasticity may permit a wider niche breadth.