Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Responsible animal-based research: three flags to consider.

A I Dagg1

  • 1Independent Studies, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. adagg@vortex.uwaterloo.ca

Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science : JAAWS
|December 21, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This study identifies questionable nonhuman animal research by flagging experiments with low citations, high animal use, and invasive procedures. This helps focus efforts on reducing animal suffering and wasted funds.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evolution of equine locomotion research.

Equine veterinary journal·1983
Same author

A review of research on equine locomotion and biomechanics.

Equine veterinary journal·1983
Same author

Diagnosis of lameness in dogs: a preliminary study.

The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne·1977
Same author

The morphology of the femur in marten and fisher.

Canadian journal of zoology·1976
Same author

Fusion of the distal femoral epiphysis in male and female marten and fisher.

Canadian journal of zoology·1975
Same author

Urine marking of cages and visual isolation as possible sources for error in behavioural studies of small mammals.

Laboratory animals·1971

Area of Science:

  • Animal research ethics
  • Scientific methodology evaluation

Background:

  • Nonhuman animal research is extensive, raising ethical concerns.
  • Reducing animal use and improving research impact are critical goals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a flagging system for identifying questionable animal-based research.
  • To pinpoint journals, institutions, and funding sources with high numbers of flagged experiments.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a sample of research articles.
  • Identification of experiments with three key characteristics: low citation rates, high animal numbers, and invasive procedures.
  • Assessment of author affiliations, journals, and funding sources.

Main Results:

  • Specific journals, Canadian universities, and funding bodies were identified as having a high number of flagged experiments.
  • The flagging system effectively highlights research with questionable impact and ethical concerns.

Conclusions:

  • Targeted interventions can reduce animal suffering and financial waste in research.
  • Focusing on high-impact entities can optimize efforts to improve animal research practices.

Related Experiment Videos