Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Cell Aggregation Assays to Evaluate the Binding of the Drosophila Notch with Trans-Ligands and its Inhibition by Cis-Ligands
Published on: January 2, 2018
Target selectivity of vertebrate notch proteins. Collaboration between discrete domains and CSL-binding site
Chin-Tong Ong1, Hui-Teng Cheng, Li-Wei Chang
1Department of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Abstract:
All four mammalian Notch proteins interact with a single DNA-binding protein (RBP-jkappa), yet they are not equivalent in activating target genes. Parallel assays of three Notch-responsive promoters in several cell lines revealed that relative activation strength is dependent on protein module and promoter context more than the cellular context. Each Notch protein reads binding site orientation and distribution on the promoter differently; Notch1 performs extremely well on paired sites, and Notch3 prefers single sites in conjunction with a proximal zinc finger transcription factor. Although head-head sites can elicit a Notch response on their own, use of CBS (CSL binding site) in tail-tail orientation is context-dependent. Bias for specific DNA elements is achieved by interplay between the N-terminal RAM (RBP-jkappa-associated molecule/ankyrin region), which interprets CBS proximity and orientation, and the C-terminal transactivation domain that interacts specifically with the transcription machinery or nearby factors. To confirm the prediction that modular design underscores the evolution of functional divergence between Notch proteins, we generated a synthetic Notch protein (Notch1 ankyrin with Notch3 transactivation domain) that displayed superior signaling strength on the hes5 promoter. Consistent with the prediction that "preferred" targets (Hes1) should respond faster and at lower Notch concentration than other targets, we showed that Hes5-GFP was extinguished fast and recovered slowly, whereas Hes1-GFP was inhibited late and recovered quickly after a pulse of DAPT in metanephroi cultures.
Insights
Notch proteins exhibit distinct DNA binding preferences, influencing target gene activation. This modularity in Notch protein structure drives functional divergence and differential gene regulation.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Developmental Biology
Background:
- Mammalian Notch proteins (Notch1-4) signal through RBP-jkappa but differ in target gene activation.
- Understanding Notch protein functional divergence is crucial for deciphering complex gene regulatory networks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how different Notch proteins differentially activate target genes.
- To elucidate the role of protein modules and DNA binding site context in Notch signaling specificity.
Main Methods:
- Assays of Notch-responsive promoters across various cell lines.
- Analysis of Notch protein binding site orientation and distribution effects.
- Generation of a synthetic Notch protein to test modularity hypotheses.
- In vivo studies using metanephroi cultures and DAPT treatment.
Main Results:
- Relative Notch protein activation strength depends on protein modules and promoter context, not cellular context.
- Notch proteins exhibit distinct preferences for DNA binding site orientation and distribution.
- A synthetic Notch protein demonstrated enhanced signaling strength on the hes5 promoter.
- Differential target gene responses (Hes1 vs. Hes5) observed in metanephroi cultures.
Conclusions:
- The modular design of Notch proteins underlies their functional divergence and signaling specificity.
- Interplay between the RAM domain and transactivation domain dictates DNA element bias.
- Understanding these mechanisms provides insight into Notch pathway regulation in development and disease.
Related Concept Videos
Notch Signaling Pathway
The Notch gene came into the limelight in 1914 after the discovery that its mutation in Drosophila melanogaster leads to a serrated (or "notched") wing margin phenotype. It was not until 1985...
Assembly of Signaling Complexes
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...

