Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Toward a construct validation of the Rorschach.

T A Widiger1, K M Schilling

  • 1Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.

Journal of Personality Assessment
|October 1, 1980
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex differences in intellectual and ego development in late adolescence.

Journal of youth and adolescence·2013
Same author

Predictive power methods may be more helpful for making a diagnosis than sensitivity and specificity.

Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology·2009
Same author

Pathology versus statistical infrequency: potential sources of gender bias in personality disorder criteria.

The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2001
Same author

Experimental manipulation of NEO-PI-R items.

Journal of personality assessment·2001
Same author

Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2001
Same author

A structured interview for the assessment of the Five-Factor Model of personality: facet-level relations to the axis II personality disorders.

Journal of personality·2001
Same journal

Comparing the Psychometric Characteristics of Two 32-Item Versions of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: An Extended Replication Study in English and Dutch.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Evaluation of a Contextualized Version of the German BFI-2 for the Digital World Across Self- and Other-Ratings.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Case Studies with the Rorschach Test: A Systematic Literature Review.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

A Stratified Analysis of Body Perception, Interoception and Somatosensory Brain Processing in Healthy Adults.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Predicting the Level of Suicide Risk with the MMPI-3.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

Strengths Knowledge Scale (SKS) and Strengths Use Scale (SUS): Revisiting Psychometric Properties and Gender Invariance in the General Spanish Population.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
See all related articles

The Rorschach test

Area of Science:

  • Psychological assessment
  • Personality testing
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • The Rorschach test's validity remains debated due to inconsistent research methodologies and evaluation criteria.
  • Lack of consensus hinders the Rorschach's acceptance in clinical and research settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a construct validation model for the Rorschach test.
  • To offer guidelines for implementing robust validation research.
  • To address challenges in aligning theory, research design, and clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • A construct validation model is proposed.
  • Guidelines for research design and evaluation criteria are outlined.
  • Discussion of the interplay between theoretical frameworks, empirical research, and clinical application.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A framework for Rorschach construct validation is detailed.
  • Specific recommendations are provided for improving research quality and consensus.
  • Challenges in integrating theoretical, empirical, and clinical aspects are analyzed.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing a standardized construct validation model can resolve Rorschach validity debates.
  • Clearer criteria and methodologies are essential for evaluating the Rorschach.
  • Bridging the gap between theory, research, and practice is crucial for the Rorschach's future.