Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
A system for assessing personal responsibility: validity, reliability and rater trainability
1Department of Psychology, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky 40475, USA.
Abstract:
Sixty-two subjects completed the California Psychological Inventory, the Rotter External-Internal locus of control scale and an audio-taped discussion of their personal problems. The audio-taped problems were rated on a five-point level of personal responsibility scale and were compared with the scores on the California Personality Inventory and the Internal-External locus of control scale in a correlation matrix which was subjected to a factor analysis. The results from these analyses supported the hypothesis that the Personal Responsibility Rating System has construct validity as a measure of psychological health. Study II assessed the trainability of the Personal Responsibility System. With a four-hour training program it was found that graduate students could be taught to rate personal responsibility in a reliable manner.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Reliability and Validity
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...