Related Experiment Videos
Control orientation and the illusion of control
1Dept. of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06032, USA.
Journal of Personality Assessment
|August 1, 1983
Summary
Individuals with an external locus of control, expecting no control, still experienced the illusion of control in a noncontingent task. This challenges assumptions about perceived control and noncontingency.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Cognitive Psychology
- Social Psychology
Background:
- Locus of control (LOC) describes an individual's generalized expectancy about the extent to which they control outcomes.
- External LOC individuals believe outcomes are due to chance or external forces, while internal LOC individuals believe outcomes are controllable.
- The illusion of control is the tendency to overestimate one's ability to influence events, particularly when they are noncontingent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if individuals with an external locus of control (LOC) avoid the illusion of control when faced with noncontingent outcomes.
- To investigate whether internal LOC individuals are more susceptible to the illusion of control than external LOC individuals.
Main Methods:
- One hundred thirty-eight students rated their perceived control over a noncontingent green light.
- Participants were assigned to either a 25% or 75% green light onset condition.
- The onset of the green light was independent of participant responses.
Main Results:
- Both internal and external LOC individuals demonstrated the illusion of control.
- Participants in both groups perceived greater control when the green light occurred more frequently (75% vs. 25%).
- This occurred despite the objective noncontingency between responses and the green light's onset.
Conclusions:
- The study challenges the hypothesis that external LOC individuals are immune to the illusion of control in noncontingent situations.
- External LOC individuals showed a susceptibility to perceived control, even when objectively absent.
- Findings suggest external LOC individuals may abandon their typical response-outcome independence bias when environmental cues suggest control, even if illusory.