Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2.

B L Roper1, Y S Ben-Porath, J N Butcher

  • 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Journal of Personality Assessment
|October 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

The computerized adaptive Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) is comparable and valid across different administration methods. This adaptive testing offers significant item savings for psychological assessments.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

FACTOR STRUCTURE O F THE MMPI IN A PSYCHIATRIC POPULATION.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes.

Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity·2016
Same author

Official Position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Social Security Administration Policy on Validity Testing: Guidance and Recommendations for Change.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2015
Same author

Failed back surgeries and minnesota multiphasic personality inventory (MMPI) profiles.

Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings·2013
Same author

Older adult norms for the Southern California Figure-Ground Visual Perception Test.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2002
Same author

Comparison of the Mexican and American norms of the MMPI-2.

Journal of clinical psychology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Psychological Assessment
  • Psychometrics
  • Computerized Adaptive Testing

Background:

  • The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) is a widely used psychological assessment tool.
  • Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) offers potential efficiency gains in test administration.
  • Assessing the comparability and validity of a CAT version of the MMPI-2 is crucial for its adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the comparability of the computerized adaptive (CA) MMPI-2 with traditional administration methods.
  • To assess the validity of the CA MMPI-2 using correlations with other psychometric measures.
  • To determine the potential for item savings with the CA MMPI-2's countdown procedure.

Main Methods:

  • A sample of 571 undergraduate students completed the MMPI-2 under three conditions: booklet test-retest, booklet-CA, and conventional computerized (CC)-CA.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The CA MMPI-2 utilized the countdown method, adaptively administering Scales L, E, 10 clinical scales, and 15 content scales.
  • Correlations were calculated between MMPI-2 scales and established measures like the Beck Depression Inventory and State-Trait Anxiety Scales.

    • Main Results:

    • High similarity was observed between MMPI-2 profiles across the three administration modalities, supporting comparability.
    • Correlations with other psychometric measures provided evidence for the validity of the CA MMPI-2.
    • The countdown procedure demonstrated potential for substantial item savings.

    Conclusions:

    • The CA MMPI-2 is a comparable and valid alternative to traditional MMPI-2 administration methods.
    • Computerized adaptive testing of the MMPI-2 offers significant advantages in terms of efficiency and item reduction.
    • The findings support the use of the CA MMPI-2 in psychological assessments.