Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing responses when each response is a curve.

D Verotta1, L B Sheiner

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco 94143.

The American Journal of Physiology
|July 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pharmacodynamic measurements of methyl nicotinate percutaneous absorption.

Pharmaceutical research·2013
Same author

Every 36-h gentamicin dosing in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy receiving hypothermia.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2013
Same author

Population analyses of atorvastatin clearance in patients living in the community and in nursing homes.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2009
Same author

A new Bayesian method to forecast and fine tune individual hemodialysis dose.

Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis·2009
Same author

Mechanistic pharmacokinetic modelling of ephedrine, norephedrine and caffeine in healthy subjects.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2005
Same author

Selecting reliable pharmacokinetic data for explanatory analyses of clinical trials in the presence of possible noncompliance.

Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics·2001
Same journal

Blood coagulation in fish.

The American journal of physiology·2011
Same journal

Renal tubular reabsorption, metabolic utilization and isomeric fractionation of lactic acid in the dog.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

The inactivation of placental toxin by human serum.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

Adrenal function following ovariectomy in the rat.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

Capillary permeability; perfusion of frog and guinea pig hind limbs.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same journal

Evaluation of protective measures against sunburn.

The American journal of physiology·2010
See all related articles

This study introduces a method to analyze population data where individual subjects' responses vary due to differing units of predictor and response variables. The technique nonparametrically estimates a common underlying "shape" function and subject-specific parameters.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Population Data Analysis

Background:

  • Population data often exhibits variability across subjects due to differences in measurement units.
  • Existing methods may not adequately account for systematic shifts and scaling in predictor and response variables among individuals.
  • The need for a flexible method to analyze such population data is evident.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe, generalize, and demonstrate a method for partially analyzing population data.
  • To address scenarios where subject data originates from a common process but with differing units.
  • To estimate a common underlying 'shape' function and subject-specific parameters.

Main Methods:

  • The method assumes a common underlying 'shape' function G(x) for all subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It models individual subject responses with parameters representing shifts and scales (beta 1i, beta 2i, beta 3i, beta 4i).
  • Two problem formulations are presented, one with a direct shape function and another involving an integral with a known function Hi(x).

    • Main Results:

    • The method successfully estimates the common 'shape' function G(x) nonparametrically.
    • It also estimates the individual subject parameters (beta 1i, beta 2i, beta 3i, beta 4i) for both problem types.
    • Demonstrates the application of this generalized analysis technique.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented method offers a robust approach to analyzing population data with inter-subject variability in variable units.
    • It allows for the estimation of both a common underlying process and individual-specific scaling and shifting parameters.
    • This technique enhances the understanding of population dynamics where individual measurement scales differ.