[On Q-wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarcts]

Much has been said, and is still being said, on Q-wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarcts, trying to relate this electrocardiographic behavior with the culprit coronary arteries and the location of the damaged myocardium. However, it seems logic to bear in mind that the presence or absence of abnormal Q waves depends on the relation established between the zone of damaged myocardium and the width of the electrical endocardium. It must be recalled that the presence of normal Q waves is possible in leads that seem to move away from the first vector of ventricular activation. Besides, the electrical endocardium, i.e., the territory of distribution of Purkinje's network, is situated mainly in the lower half of the ventricles and is virtually absent in basal regions. This endocardium constitutes a histological-functional entity, since the Purkinje fibers, which receive at the same time the activation impulses, are depolarized simultaneously without producing differences in potential. Therefore, these fibers cannot supply an electrical contribution either in normal condition or in the presence of limited damage. Nevertheless, when the damaged zone reaches beyond the exterior limits of this endocardium, for example, in regions where it is small, the exploring electrode can register abnormal Q waves, due to the activation fronts that are moving away, followed by R waves originated in contiguous bands of non-damaged myocardium. We present two characteristic examples of the electrocardiographic manifestations of a transmural left ventricle infarct (QS complexes) and of a subendocardial infarct, reaching beyond the borders of the electrical endocardium (QR complexes). In both of these cases, the electrocardiographic data agree with the anatomical findings.