Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Invalid assumptions and methodological difficulties in early memory research.

A R Bruhn1, H Schiffman

  • 1Dept. of Psychology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.

Journal of Personality Assessment
|January 1, 1982
PubMed
Summary

Researchers identified flawed assumptions in early memory studies. They propose principles and emphasize pilot studies to improve future research design and avoid methodological weaknesses.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early memories and maladjustment: comment on Spirrison, et al. and recalled age of earliest memory.

Psychological reports·1998
Same author

Ideographic aspects of injury memories: applying contextual theory to the Comprehensive Early Memories Scoring System--revised.

Journal of personality assessment·1995
Same author

Early memories and the criminally dangerous.

Journal of personality assessment·1992
Same author

The early memories procedure: a projective test of autobiographical memory, Part 1.

Journal of personality assessment·1992
Same author

The early memories procedure: a projective test of autobiographical memory, part 2.

Journal of personality assessment·1992
Same author

Earliest memories and the dynamics of delinquency: a replication study.

Journal of personality assessment·1990

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Recent studies on early memory development have faced methodological challenges.
  • Inconsistencies in research design may impact the validity of findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the assumptions underlying early memory research methodologies.
  • To provide guidelines for improving the design of future early memory studies.

Main Methods:

  • Review and critique of existing methodologies in early memory research.
  • Identification of common design flaws and invalid assumptions.
  • Formulation of principles for robust study design.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Specific invalid assumptions in recent early memory studies were identified.
  • Key principles for enhancing methodological rigor were proposed.
  • The critical importance of population-appropriate pilot studies was highlighted.

    • Conclusions:

    • Addressing methodological flaws is crucial for advancing the understanding of early memory.
    • Adherence to proposed principles can strengthen the reliability and validity of future research.
    • Pilot studies are essential for ensuring the suitability of research designs for specific populations.