Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images (SDM-PSI)
Published on: November 27, 2019
Current status of MMPI-2 research: a methodologic overview
1Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, Palo Alto, California 94303-4233, USA.
Abstract:
MMPI-2 research since 1990 has been reviewed to assess whether Butcher and Tellegen's (1978) concerns and suggestions about MMPI research were being followed. Guidelines are provided for when the MMPI-2 is appropriate to administer, how to describe the sample used, assessing validity of the profile, what scores to analyze, and how to report the results. Suggestions also are presented for research within several current areas of debate in the MMPI-2: codetype comparability between the MMPI and MMPI-2, incremental validity of new or existing scales, obvious and subtle subscales, emphasis on item content, development of new scales, and correcting profiles for specific medical and physical conditions.
Insights
This review examines Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) research since 1990, evaluating adherence to prior guidelines. It offers recommendations for appropriate MMPI-2 administration, scoring, and reporting to improve research quality.
Area of Science:
- Psychological assessment
- Personality research
- Clinical psychology
Background:
- Concerns regarding the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) research practices were raised by Butcher and Tellegen in 1978.
- A review of MMPI-2 research published since 1990 was conducted to assess adherence to these earlier concerns and suggestions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality of MMPI-2 research conducted since 1990.
- To provide updated guidelines for MMPI-2 research methodology.
- To address ongoing debates within the MMPI-2 research field.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of MMPI-2 research literature from 1990 onwards.
- Analysis of research practices concerning administration, sample description, validity assessment, score analysis, and result reporting.
- Identification of key areas of debate in MMPI-2 research.
Main Results:
- The review identified specific areas where MMPI-2 research practices could be improved.
- Guidelines were developed for appropriate MMPI-2 test administration and interpretation.
- Key research debates, including codetype comparability and scale validity, were highlighted.
Conclusions:
- Adherence to best practices in MMPI-2 research requires attention to methodological details.
- The study provides a framework for enhancing the rigor and utility of future MMPI-2 research.
- Recommendations are offered to address current controversies and advance the understanding of the MMPI-2.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...