Related Experiment Videos
On shortening the Expanded Attributional Style Questionnaire.
1Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Journal of Personality Assessment
|January 1, 1991
Summary
A new short form of the Expanded Attributional Style Questionnaire (EASQ) was evaluated. Findings suggest that item selection varies across samples, potentially impacting reliability and validity in attributional style research.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- The Expanded Attributional Style Questionnaire (EASQ) was developed to improve upon the psychometric properties of the original Attributional Style Questionnaire.
- A short form of the EASQ has been described, necessitating an evaluation of its psychometric utility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the psychometric properties of the short form of the Expanded Attributional Style Questionnaire (EASQ).
- To determine the reliability and validity of the EASQ short form across diverse samples.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from eight independent samples (N = 963) utilizing the EASQ short form.
- Evaluation of item performance and reliability using statistical methods, including predictions from the Spearman-Brown formula.
Main Results:
- The optimal items for the EASQ short form varied significantly across different samples and attributional dimensions.
- Reliability estimates for the EASQ short form were found to be reduced, consistent with Spearman-Brown formula predictions.
- The trade-off between brevity and psychometric integrity requires careful consideration.
Conclusions:
- The selection of items for the EASQ short form is not universal and requires sample-specific validation.
- Reduced reliability may consequently impact the validity of findings in attributional style research using the EASQ short form.
- Researchers should exercise caution when employing the EASQ short form and consider its psychometric limitations.