Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis.

Omer Aziz1, Thanos Athanasiou, Paris P Tekkis

  • 1Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

Annals of Surgery
|December 24, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying quality markers and improvement measures for ward-based surgical care: a semistructured interview study.

American journal of surgery·2015
Same author

Using preoperative imaging for intraoperative guidance: a case of mistaken identity.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2015
Same author

The quality narrative in health care.

Lancet (London, England)·2015
Same author

The endoscopy evolution: 'the superscope era'.

Frontline gastroenterology·2015
Same author

A wearable mobility assessment device for total knee replacement: A longitudinal feasibility study.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2015
Same author

A national incident reporting and learning system in England and Wales, but at what cost?

Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research·2015

Laparoscopic appendectomy in children significantly reduces wound infections and ileus compared to open surgery. Further research is needed to compare these appendectomy techniques in pediatric patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric surgery
  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Gastrointestinal surgery

Background:

  • Appendectomy is a common pediatric surgical procedure.
  • Laparoscopic and open approaches are utilized for appendectomy.
  • Previous meta-analyses have not specifically focused on pediatric populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children.
  • To evaluate key postoperative outcomes and complications associated with each surgical technique.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies published between 1992 and 2004.
  • Inclusion criteria focused on pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy.
  • Endpoints included postoperative pyrexia, ileus, wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, operative time, and hospital stay.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy demonstrated significantly lower rates of wound infection and ileus.
  • Operative time was comparable, and postoperative hospital stay was shorter with the laparoscopic approach.
  • Intra-abdominal abscess formation was slightly higher in the laparoscopic group but not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy appears to reduce complications in pediatric patients.
  • High-quality randomized trials are recommended for further comparison, considering factors like obesity and appendicitis severity.