Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Does bioequivalence between modified cyclosporine formulations translate into equal outcomes?
David J Taber1, G Mark Baillie, Elizabeth E Ashcraft
1School of Pharmacy, Wingate University, Wingate, NC, USA.
Abstract:
Neoral was replaced with a generic cyclosporine formulation on our hospital formulary. We compared outcomes for de novo kidney transplant recipients who either received Gengraf (n=88) or Neoral (n=100) in a single-center, retrospective review. As compared to patients who received Neoral, patients who received Gengraf were significantly more likely to have an acute rejection episode (39% vs. 25%, P=0.04), more likely to have a second rejection episode (13% vs. 4%; P=0.03), or to have received an antibody preparation to treat acute rejection (19% vs. 8%; P=0.02). Patients treated with Gengraf had a higher degree of intrapatient variability for cyclosporine trough concentrations as determined by %CV (P<0.05). The incidence of acute rejection at 6 months posttransplant was significantly higher in patients who received Gengraf compared to Neoral. A larger, prospective analysis is warranted to compare these formulations of cyclosporine in de novo kidney transplant recipients.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence: Overview
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Pharmaceutical Equivalents
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
