Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[G-dRG version 2005: relevant aspects for dermatology].

Peter Hensen1, Torsten Fürstenberg, Meinhard Schiller

  • 1Klinik und Poliklinik für Hautkrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Münster. hensenp@mednet.uni-muenster.de

Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG
|December 24, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie·2024
Same author

[Reorientation of the hospital planning in NRW-Importance for cardiovascular medicine and thoracic surgery].

Zeitschrift fur Herz-, Thorax- und Gefasschirurgie·2023
Same author

Comparison of different skin care regimens in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis receiving systemic treatment: A randomized controlled trial.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2023
Same author

Increased skin pH and transepidermal water loss may serve as predictor for atopic dermatitis flares.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2022
Same author

Subgroup Analysis of Crisaborole for Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis in Children Aged 2 to < 18 Years.

Paediatric drugs·2022
Same author

Translating the Investigator's Static Global Assessment to the Eczema Area and Severity Index in Studies of Crisaborole for Atopic Dermatitis.

Dermatology and therapy·2021
Same journal

The different face of skin-rash induced by brentuximab vedotin.

Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG·2026
Same journal

Repositioning Non-Ablative Fractional Lasers - Molecular and Histological Insights from a scoping review.

Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG·2026
Same journal

Infusion-site reactions to foslevodopa/foscarbidopa in Parkinson's disease.

Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG·2026
Same journal

Tranexamic Acid-Soaked Intranasal Packing for Postoperative Bleeding After Nasal Interpolation Flap Repair.

Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG·2026
Same journal

Monoclonal gammopathy of dermatological significance: non-amyloid paraprotein deposits with light and heavy chains.

Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG·2026
Same journal

Papular epidermal nevus with "skyline" basal cell layer: Clinical clues from a three-member family.

Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG·2026
See all related articles

The German Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) system 2005 offers improved clinical service depiction and problem resolution compared to prior versions. While enhancing specialized care mapping, some inconsistencies in dermatology and highly specialized procedures persist.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Hospital Management
  • Medical Classification Systems

Background:

  • Implementation of a new hospital funding system based on Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) in Germany.
  • Publication of the third version of the German DRG system (G-DRG version 2005) one year after mandatory implementation.
  • Significant differences between the G-DRG version 2005 and its predecessors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the crucial aspects of the G-DRG version 2005.
  • To analyze the accompanying rules and regulations of payment.
  • To assess the relevance and impact of the G-DRG version 2005 specifically for dermatology.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of modifications in the classification system of the G-DRG version 2005.
  • Evaluation of the introduction of further procedure-based payments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of changes in algorithms for major diagnostic categories and consideration of complications, comorbidities, and multiple procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • G-DRG version 2005 provides a better depiction of specialized clinical services.
    • Many acknowledged problems from 2004 have been resolved, leading to more appropriate mapping of clinical services.
    • Algorithms have been modified for more precise group selection, considering complications, comorbidities, and multiple procedures.

    Conclusions:

    • G-DRG version 2005 represents a significant improvement over previous versions.
    • Inconsistencies remain concerning highly specialized medical procedures and inpatient dermatological care.
    • The updated system offers a more appropriate mapping of clinical services, despite remaining challenges.