Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.

Mitchell D Schnall1, Jeffrey Blume, David A Bluemke

  • 1Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Mitchell.Schnall@uphs.upenn.edu

Radiology
|December 24, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An artificial intelligence framework for universal landmark matching and morphometry in musculoskeletal radiography.

European radiology·2026
Same author

Treatment of Irresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases by Combination of Liver Resection and Percutaneous Tumor Ablation: Mid-term Outcome.

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·2026
Same author

Effect of Reporting Mode and Clinical Experience on Radiologists' Gaze and Image Analysis Behavior at Chest Radiography.

Radiology·2026
Same author

Statistics in Medicine - What's in an Estimand?

The New England journal of medicine·2025
Same author

Breast Cancer Screening: A Decade of Progress.

Investigative radiology·2025
Same author

AI in motion: the impact of data augmentation strategies on mitigating MRI motion artifacts.

European radiology·2025

Breast MRI features, including architectural and dynamic patterns, are crucial for cancer diagnosis. Multivariate models combining these features offer superior diagnostic accuracy compared to dynamic enhancement patterns alone.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a vital tool in breast cancer detection and diagnosis.
  • Understanding the predictive value of various imaging features is essential for improving diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To prospectively evaluate the prevalence and predictive value of three-dimensional (3D) and dynamic breast MR imaging features.
  • To assess the diagnostic performance of individual and combined imaging features in predictive models for breast cancer.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective analysis of 995 lesions in 854 women using 3D and dynamic 2D breast MR imaging.
  • Readers assessed enhancement shape, distribution, border architecture, intensity, and kinetic curve patterns.
  • Multivariate models were constructed using architectural and dynamic features, with diagnostic accuracy measured by areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The absence of enhancement showed an 88% negative predictive value for cancer.
  • Focal mass margins (Az = 0.76) and signal intensity (Az = 0.70) were highly predictive.
  • Multivariate models incorporating multiple features achieved a high diagnostic accuracy (Az = 0.880).

Conclusions:

  • Architectural and dynamic features are critical for accurate breast MR imaging interpretation.
  • Multivariate models integrating these features demonstrate superior diagnostic accuracy over qualitative dynamic enhancement assessment.