Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

06:16
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
A Porsche for patient accrual
1Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA. david.steinberg@comcast.net
Cancer Investigation
|December 27, 2005
Summary
Offering expensive prizes for patient accrual in clinical trials may undermine public trust. This practice risks prioritizing financial gain over patient welfare and scientific integrity in oncology research.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Patient accrual is critical for cancer research.
- Incentives are sometimes used to encourage patient enrollment in clinical trials.
- The ethical implications of financial incentives require careful consideration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the ethical implications of offering substantial financial incentives for patient accrual in oncology clinical trials.
- To explore the potential impact of such incentives on public perception and scientific integrity.
Main Methods:
- The study discusses a specific instance of a lottery prize for patient accrual in a Southwest Oncology Group prostate cancer protocol.
- It analyzes the ethical considerations and potential consequences of this incentive structure.
Main Results:
- The incentive, while intended to boost patient enrollment, raises ethical concerns.
- Rewarding physicians with expensive prizes may create a perception of self-interest over patient welfare.
- Widespread use of such incentives could damage public confidence in clinical research.
Conclusions:
- The practice of offering expensive rewards for patient accrual in clinical trials is ethically questionable.
- Such incentives may erode public trust and potentially harm the reputation of medical research.
- The long-term negative consequences may outweigh the short-term benefits of increased patient enrollment.

