Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medical errors: getting the incentives right.

Sverre Grepperud1

  • 1Institute of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, P.O. 1089, N-0317, Oslo, Norway. sverre.grepperud@medisin.uio.no

International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics
|December 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contracting with sequential care providers.

Health economics review·2024
Same author

Healthcare utilization and catastrophic health expenditure in rural Tanzania: does voluntary health insurance matter?

BMC public health·2023
Same author

Whether or not to enroll, and stay enrolled? A Tanzanian cross-sectional study on voluntary health insurance.

Health policy OPEN·2023
Same author

The role of risk preferences: voluntary health insurance in rural Tanzania.

Health economics review·2023
Same author

Do household perceptions influence enrolment decisions into community-based health insurance schemes in Tanzania?

BMC health services research·2021
Same author

Supply factors as determinants of treatment costs: clinicians' assessments of a given set of referrals to community mental health centers in Norway.

BMC health services research·2018
Same journal

The effect of social health insurance on prenatal care: the case of Ghana.

International journal of health care finance and economics·2014
Same journal

Changing healthcare capital-to-labor ratios: evidence and implications for bending the cost curve in Canada and beyond.

International journal of health care finance and economics·2014
Same journal

Health care expenditure decisions in the presence of devolution and equalisation grants.

International journal of health care finance and economics·2014
Same journal

Socialized medicine and mortality.

International journal of health care finance and economics·2014
Same journal

The impact of global budgeting on treatment intensity and outcomes.

International journal of health care finance and economics·2014
Same journal

Payment generosity and physician acceptance of Medicare and Medicaid patients.

International journal of health care finance and economics·2014
See all related articles

Implementing accountability and non-report penalties can prevent medical errors and ensure transparency. Optimal schemes, like confidentiality, may not always be punitive, offering flexible approaches to medical safety.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Medical Law and Ethics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Medical errors pose significant risks to patient safety and healthcare system efficiency.
  • Effective incentive structures are crucial for error prevention and transparent reporting in healthcare.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the effectiveness of different penalty schemes in incentivizing medical error prevention and reporting.
  • To evaluate the properties of various sanction systems, including accountability, non-report, voluntary reporting, immunity, and confidentiality.

Main Methods:

  • Economic modeling to assess the impact of different penalty structures on provider behavior.
  • Comparative analysis of sanction systems based on their ability to achieve optimal outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A dual-penalty scheme (accountability and non-report) can achieve optimal outcomes but may not always result in punitive measures.
  • Confidentiality (anonymity) emerges as an optimal sanction scheme.
  • Restrictions on penalty scope and scale can influence the toughness or softness of sanction schemes.

Conclusions:

  • Carefully designed penalty systems are essential for improving patient safety and healthcare transparency.
  • Confidentiality offers a uniquely effective approach to managing medical errors.
  • Flexibility in penalty design, considering scope and scale, is key to tailoring sanction schemes.