Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiation safety design for the J-PARC Project.

H Nakashima1, Y Nakane, F Masukawa

  • 1Center for Proton Accelerator Facilities, JAERI Tokai, Naka, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan. nakasima@shield4.tokai.jaeri.go.jp

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
|December 31, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Terahertz quantum cascade lasers employing convex phonon well.

Optics express·2025
Same author

Mini-review: Pathways of postural disturbances tracing to the stomatognathic system.

Neuroscience letters·2024
Same author

CORRIGENDUM TO: PHOTON FIELD OF ~100-200 KEV FOR ENVIRONMENTAL DOSEMETER CALIBRATION.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2020
Same author

Response of plastic scintillator to gamma sources.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2020
Same author

PHOTON FIELD OF ~100-200 KEV FOR ENVIRONMENTAL DOSEMETER CALIBRATION.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2020
Same author

The muscular dystrophic chicken is hypernatremic.

British poultry science·2017
Same journal

The establishment and implementation of Indonesian diagnostic reference levels: a national framework for optimizing medical radiation exposure.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

LIST OF REVIEWERS FOR 2025.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Development of CaSO4: Dy-based ring badge for extremity dose monitoring of radiation workers in India.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

A proposal for a differentiated radiation protection program for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants compared to the operation of nuclear power plants.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

A three-dimensional neutron localization method based on double-scattering imaging and reconstruction algorithm.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Effect of 131I biodistribution on measurements using a scanning whole-body counter.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
See all related articles

The Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex (J-PARC) utilizes simplified and detailed methods for radiation shielding design. This review covers the current status of radiation safety for this high-intensity proton accelerator.

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear Physics and Engineering
  • Particle Accelerator Technology
  • Radiation Safety

Background:

  • The Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex (J-PARC) project aims to advance basic science and nuclear technology.
  • J-PARC is constructing a high-energy proton accelerator complex with world-leading instantaneous intensity.
  • Effective radiation shielding is critical for the safe operation of such a facility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the radiation safety design studies for the J-PARC facility.
  • To present the current status of shielding design methodologies employed at J-PARC.
  • To inform future radiation safety protocols for high-intensity accelerators.

Main Methods:

  • Application of simplified design methods for initial shielding assessments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Implementation of detailed design methods for precise radiation shielding calculations.
  • Integration of both approaches to ensure a comprehensive shielding strategy.
  • Main Results:

    • The shielding design for J-PARC incorporates a dual approach of simplified and detailed methods.
    • These methods are being refined to manage radiation from the high-intensity proton beam.
    • The review consolidates the progress and findings of the radiation safety design studies.

    Conclusions:

    • A robust radiation safety design is being established for J-PARC.
    • The combined use of simplified and detailed methods provides a reasonable shielding design.
    • Ongoing studies ensure the safe advancement of nuclear technology at J-PARC.