Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Reconfirmation algorithms should be the standard of care in automated external defibrillators
1Cardiology Department. St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia. sfaddy@stvincents.com.au
Insights
Resuscitating patients with non-sustained arrhythmias is challenging. Automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) sometimes lack rhythm reconfirmation, risking ineffective shocks for non-shockable rhythms.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Non-sustained and self-terminating arrhythmias present unique resuscitation challenges.
- The impact of defibrillation shocks on non-shockable rhythms remains poorly understood.
- Rhythm assessment before shock delivery is critical, especially with automated external defibrillators (AEDs) used by minimally trained personnel.
Observation:
- Current-generation AEDs exhibit variable implementation of rhythm reconfirmation algorithms.
- Only 71% of investigated AEDs incorporate reconfirmation algorithms.
- A case demonstrated spontaneous reversion of a non-sustained arrhythmia prior to potential intervention.
Findings:
- A significant proportion of current AEDs may deliver shocks to non-shockable rhythms due to absent or inadequate reconfirmation algorithms.
- Spontaneous rhythm reversion can occur in non-sustained arrhythmias, complicating resuscitation efforts.
- The study highlights a gap in AED technology regarding reliable rhythm assessment.
Implications:
- Delivering shocks to non-shockable rhythms may be ineffective and potentially harmful.
- There is a need for improved AED algorithms to ensure accurate rhythm detection before shock delivery.
- Enhanced device intelligence and rescuer training are crucial for optimizing resuscitation outcomes in challenging arrhythmia scenarios.
Abstract:
Non-sustained and self-terminating arrhythmias pose a significant challenge during resuscitation. Delivery of a defibrillation shock to a non-shockable rhythm has a poorly understood effect on the heart. The importance of assessing rhythm right up until the delivery of a shock is of increased importance when "blind" shocks are being delivered by automatic defibrillators or minimally trained rescuers. Reconfirmation algorithms are common in current-generation implantable defibrillators but this investigation of current-generation AEDs shows that only 71% of devices presently available have reconfirmation algorithms. A case of spontaneous reversion of a non-sustained arrhythmia is presented. The implications of delivering a defibrillator shock to a non-shockable rhythm are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
