Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Large-scale neural models and dynamic causal modelling.

Lucy Lee1, Karl Friston, Barry Horwitz

  • 1Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

Neuroimage
|January 3, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The methodological foundations of lesion network mapping remain sound.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Ethnic Bridging of Votoplam, a HTT Gene Splicing Modifier, Using Pharmacokinetic Comparison Between Caucasian and Japanese Subjects.

Clinical pharmacology in drug development·2026
Same author

Insula Structure Is Linked to Autonomic Cardiac Dysregulation in Depression.

Biological psychiatry·2026
Same author

Correction: Dynamic causal models in infectious disease epidemiology-an assessment of their predictive validity based on the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK 2020 to 2024.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Real-world adherence to and persistence with emicizumab in people with hemophilia A using a national claims database.

Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy·2026
Same author

Active Inference and Functional Parametrisation: Differential Flatness and Smooth Random Realisation.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Lifespan Trajectories of the Brain's Functional Complexity Characterized by Multiscale Sample Entropy.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Pleasant fragrance modulates dyadic social sharing of positive emotion: Sharer-centered socioemotional enhancement effect and its neural couplings.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Altered Functional Hierarchical and Sequential Organization in Individuals with Schizophrenia during Auditory Processing.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Mechanical Deformation Explains Distinct Neuroimaging Patterns and Etiologies in Brain Trauma.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Ventral striatum temporal interference brain stimulation enhances the reward-positivity event-related potential and reduces anxiety.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

NeuroHarm‑Kit: An Open‑Source Toolbox for Benchmarking Deep‑Learning Harmonization of Multi‑Site T1‑Weighted MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) inferences about brain connectivity are validated using neurobiologically grounded computational models. Bayesian model comparison confirms DCM

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Brain Imaging Analysis

Background:

  • Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) estimates coupling between brain areas and experimental influences.
  • Large-scale neural modelling creates computational models to understand neuronal systems.
  • Previous work simulated BOLD time-series using large-scale models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate DCM inferences on connectivity structure and task-dependent modulatory effects.
  • To assess the impact of misspecifying regions of interest in DCM.
  • To explore DCM's validity using a known connectivity structure in a simulated system.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized DCM to infer effective connectivity from simulated data of a visual delayed match-to-sample task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed Bayesian Model Comparison to evaluate models with hierarchical and reciprocal connections.
  • Examined the effects of anatomical connectivity and bilinear effects specification.

    • Main Results:

    • Models with correctly specified anatomical connectivity showed strong evidence.
    • Bayesian model comparison favored models where bilinear effects matched neural model implementation.
    • Conditional uncertainty in coupling estimates increased with incorrectly specified regions.

    Conclusions:

    • Neural models are crucial for validating estimation and inference schemes like DCM.
    • Bayesian model comparison confirms the validity of DCM when applied to a comprehensive neuronal model.
    • Accurate region specification is vital for reliable DCM parameter estimates.