Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research governance: regulating risk and reducing harm?

Sara Shaw1, Geraldine Barrett

  • 1Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, Highgate Hill, London N19 5LW, UK. s.shaw@pcps.ucl.ac.uk

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
|January 3, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social and Ethical Aspects of Remote and Hybrid Care in the Special Allocation Scheme in general practice (SEARCH): A mixed methods feasibility study protocol.

NIHR open research·2026
Same author

Which transitions count? A systematic hermeneutic review of the literature on transitions of care.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

Remote Access to Primary Care: Theorising 'Care Navigation'.

Sociology of health & illness·2026
Same author

Choreographing Triage: Making Patient Requests 'Flow' Through Digitally Enabled Systems of Access and Decision-Making in NHS Primary Care.

Sociology of health & illness·2026
Same author

Measuring progress in pregnancy planning and preconception health.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

The carbon footprints of single-use and reusable medical devices: a systematic review.

BMJ open·2025
Same journal

The Placebo Effect and Long History of the Habit of Belief. How a Medieval Image Reveals the Power of the Invisible.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
Same journal

For more events and to book online, please visit //www.rsm.ac.uk/events.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
Same journal

Who is responsible when AI kills?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
Same journal

Patient-centred care: is it enough?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
Same journal

Continuity of care beyond access: measuring resolution rather than contact.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
Same journal

Ethnic differences in specialty destinations in UK medicine: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of secondary data.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2026
See all related articles

Research risk assessment anticipates consequences and researcher impact. Effective risk management adapts to study specifics and societal influences, ensuring participant and researcher protection.

Area of Science:

  • Research Ethics
  • Risk Management in Science

Background:

  • Risk assessment is crucial for anticipating research consequences and researcher impact.
  • Sociopolitical environments shape national and local research regulation and review processes.
  • Variability in research risks necessitates adaptive review and approval systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the multifaceted nature of risk assessment in research.
  • To highlight the influence of the socio-political context on risk management.
  • To emphasize the need for adaptable review systems tailored to study specifics.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of risk assessment principles in research.
  • Examination of regulatory and review system variations.
  • Discussion of adaptive strategies for managing research risks.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Risk assessment serves as a critical lens for evaluating research consequences.
  • Social and political factors significantly influence risk management approaches.
  • No research can guarantee absolute safety, but reasonable protections are essential.

Conclusions:

  • Research safety relies on adaptable risk assessment and management strategies.
  • Tailoring review processes to study-specific risks is paramount.
  • Robust protective measures and contingency plans are vital for participant and researcher well-being.