Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An ethical framework for psychiatry.

Sidney Bloch1, Stephen A Green

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia 3065. s.bloch@unimelb.edu.au

The British Journal of Psychiatry : the Journal of Mental Science
|January 3, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Psychiatry needs a unified ethical framework. Combining principlism (respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice) with care ethics offers a synergistic approach for clinical decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Position statements of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists: An historical perspective.

Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists·2023
Same author

Publisher Correction: A lamprey neural cell type atlas illuminates the origins of the vertebrate brain.

Nature ecology & evolution·2023
Same author

A lamprey neural cell type atlas illuminates the origins of the vertebrate brain.

Nature ecology & evolution·2023
Same author

Evolution of a chordate-specific mechanism for myoblast fusion.

Science advances·2022
Same author

Codes of ethics for psychiatrists: past, present and prospect.

Psychological medicine·2022
Same author

The 30th anniversary of the code of ethics of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists-a worthy milestone.

Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists·2022

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Moral Philosophy
  • Psychiatry

Background:

  • Lack of consensus on ethical decision-making frameworks in psychiatry.
  • Existing theories may conflict, causing clinical confusion and inaction.
  • Need for updated theoretical approaches integrating recent moral philosophy insights.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine major bioethical theories and their application in psychiatry.
  • To explore complementary ethical frameworks for psychiatric practice.
  • To propose an integrated theoretical model for ethical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Review of major theories in bioethics.
  • Consultations with moral philosophers and psychiatrists.
  • Integration of insights from contemporary moral philosophy.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No single theoretical framework is optimal for psychiatric ethics.
  • A synergistic combination of compatible approaches is recommended.
  • Principlism and care ethics offer a complementary model for psychiatric care.

Conclusions:

  • An integrated approach combining principlism and care ethics enhances ethical decision-making in psychiatry.
  • This synergistic model addresses the needs of vulnerable psychiatric patients.
  • Future psychiatric ethical frameworks should adopt a complementary, multi-theoretical stance.