Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Testing experimental data for univariate normality.

A Ralph Henderson1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C1. ahenders@uwo.ca

Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry
|January 4, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Information for authors: Is the advice regarding the reporting of residuals in regression analysis incomplete? Should Cook's distance be included?

Clinical chemistry·2006
Same author

The bootstrap: a technique for data-driven statistics. Using computer-intensive analyses to explore experimental data.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2005
Same journal

Reference intervals for venous blood gas measurement in a healthy Chinese population.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Multiplex methylation marker analysis for ctDNA detection in liquid biopsies from anal cancer patients: an HPV-independent approach.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of patient-based exponentially weighted moving average quality control models for three antipsychotic drugs and their metabolites by LC-MS/MS.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Comparing conventional correction formulas and machine learning-based prediction of ionized calcium.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Micro- and nanoplastics as emerging clinical analytes: analytical validation, interpretive uncertainty, and laboratory actionability in human specimens.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Performance of Free Light Chain reagents in the Dutch External Quality Assessment programme over the past 14 years.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
See all related articles

This study evaluates methods for assessing data normality in clinical chemistry, recommending graphical techniques, L-moments, and specific statistical tests like Anderson-Darling and Shapiro-Wilk for reliable results, while accounting for sample size effects.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Experimentally-derived data sets are common in clinical chemistry.
  • Graphical and quantitative methods are essential for assessing data distribution and normality.
  • It is crucial to ensure that normality test results are independent of sample size.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate graphical and quantitative methods for assessing data normality.
  • To compare various normality tests and identify those robust to sample size effects.
  • To propose a systematic approach for normality testing in clinical chemistry.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized four experimentally-derived data sets representing normal, kurtotic, and skewed distributions.
  • Employed graphical techniques (histograms, box-and-whisker, Q-Q plots).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed data using moment tests, L-moments, and various normality tests (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramér-von Mises, Anderson-Darling, Shapiro-Wilk, Shapiro-Francia, etc.), monitoring for sample size effects with Royston's V'/v' test.

    • Main Results:

    • Histograms and box-and-whisker plots, supplemented by Q-Q plots, are preferred graphical methods.
    • L-moments are advocated over classical skewness and kurtosis tests due to potential confusion.
    • Anderson-Darling, Shapiro-Wilk, and Shapiro-Francia tests demonstrated superior classification accuracy across all tested distributions; Royston's test effectively monitored sample size effects.

    Conclusions:

    • A systematic approach to normality testing should integrate graphical presentation, L-moments analysis, and robust statistical tests (Anderson-Darling, Shapiro-Wilk, Shapiro-Francia).
    • Monitoring for sample size effects using Royston's test is a critical final step.