Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?

Ross M Reul1

  • 1The Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. rreul@heart.thi.tmc.edu

Insights

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unlikely to be replaced by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents. CABG offers more complete revascularization and better long-term graft patency than PCI.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Medical Technology Assessment

Background:

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially with drug-eluting stents (DESs), is increasingly popular for coronary artery disease (CAD).
  • Speculation exists that PCI may eventually replace coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the continued role of CABG in CAD treatment compared to PCI.
  • To assess the long-term viability and benefits of CABG in light of advancements in PCI.

Main Methods:

  • Review of published randomized trials comparing CABG and PCI.
  • Analysis of patient selection criteria in trials comparing revascularization strategies.
  • Evaluation of revascularization completeness, repeat revascularization rates, and graft patency data.

Main Results:

  • Many trials comparing CABG and PCI used highly selected patient subgroups, potentially favoring PCI outcomes.
  • CABG provides more complete revascularization and better freedom from repeat procedures.
  • Long-term patency data for CABG grafts (e.g., LIMA-LAD) are well-established, unlike for DESs.

Conclusions:

  • CABG is unlikely to become obsolete due to PCI advancements.
  • Both CABG and PCI have ongoing technological improvements.
  • CABG remains a vital and effective treatment option for specific CAD patient populations.