Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?
1The Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. rreul@heart.thi.tmc.edu
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unlikely to be replaced by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents. CABG offers more complete revascularization and better long-term graft patency than PCI.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Technology Assessment
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially with drug-eluting stents (DESs), is increasingly popular for coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Speculation exists that PCI may eventually replace coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the continued role of CABG in CAD treatment compared to PCI.
- To assess the long-term viability and benefits of CABG in light of advancements in PCI.
Main Methods:
- Review of published randomized trials comparing CABG and PCI.
- Analysis of patient selection criteria in trials comparing revascularization strategies.
- Evaluation of revascularization completeness, repeat revascularization rates, and graft patency data.
Main Results:
- Many trials comparing CABG and PCI used highly selected patient subgroups, potentially favoring PCI outcomes.
- CABG provides more complete revascularization and better freedom from repeat procedures.
- Long-term patency data for CABG grafts (e.g., LIMA-LAD) are well-established, unlike for DESs.
Conclusions:
- CABG is unlikely to become obsolete due to PCI advancements.
- Both CABG and PCI have ongoing technological improvements.
- CABG remains a vital and effective treatment option for specific CAD patient populations.
Abstract:
Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the treatment of choice for certain types of coronary artery disease (CAD), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)--particularly coronary angioplasty with stenting--has become the most popular nonmedical treatment approach to CAD. Some have speculated that, with the advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs), PCI will replace CABG entirely. However, the complete disappearance of CABG is both unlikely and unwarranted, for several reasons. Published randomized trials of CABG, PCI, and medical approaches to CAD compared only highly selected subgroups of patients because of strict exclusion criteria that often favored the PCI cohorts. Therefore, their results do not constitute sufficient evidence for the superiority of PCI over CABG in all CAD patients requiring revascularization. As PCI indications broaden to include more complex lesions and more high-risk patients, outcomes will not remain as favorable. In addition, although PCI is less invasive than surgery, CABG offers more complete revascularization and better freedom from repeat revascularization. Furthermore, no long-term patency data on DESs yet exist, whereas excellent 10- and 20-year patency rates have been reported for the left internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending artery graft used in most CABG procedures. While PCI has been changing, CABG has not been stagnant; recently, advances in many aspects of the CABG procedure have improved short- and long-term outcomes in CABG patients. Both CABG and PCI technologies will continue to advance, not necessarily exclusive of one another, but no data yet exist to suggest that DESs will render CABG obsolete any time soon.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview