Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improving construct validity: Cronbach, Meehl, and Neurath's ship.

Drew Westen1, Robert Rosenthal

  • 1Department of Psychology, Emory University, 532 Kilgo Circle, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA. dwesten@emory.edu

Psychological Assessment
|January 6, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association Between Attachment Patterns and Personality Disorders: A Multimethod Multi-Informant Study Using a Clinical Sample.

The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2021
Same author

Acne vulgaris and risk of depression and anxiety: A meta-analytic review.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2020
Same author

Unpacking childhood experiences of abuse: Can clinicians identify their patients' History of Abuse?

Journal of trauma & dissociation : the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Dissociation (ISSD)·2020
Same author

Reduced perineuronal net expression in Fmr1 KO mice auditory cortex and amygdala is linked to impaired fear-associated memory.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2019
Same author

Validity and clinical utility of DSM and prototype diagnosis for depressive and anxiety spectrum disorders in predicting adaptive functioning.

Psychiatry research·2018
Same author

Reliability of DSM and empirically derived prototype diagnosis for mood, anxiety and personality disorders.

Comprehensive psychiatry·2018
Same journal

Modeling of parent-rated psychopathology in children and adolescents using the Child Behavior Checklist.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Racial differences in static and dynamic sexual risk assessment instruments: Static-99R and Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Maladaptive exercise: A psychometric investigation.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Depression and suicidal ideation and behavior measurement invariance: A comparison of foreign-born and U.S.-born service members.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal measurement invariance and psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS), and Positive Emotion Scale (PES) among community-dwelling adults.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Differential utility of immediate versus delayed memory measures for the identification of episodic memory impairment: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Psychological assessment·2026
See all related articles

Construct validity is a dynamic process that requires careful interpretation of study results. Quantitative metrics can aid scientific judgment by mitigating cognitive biases in evaluating constructs and measures.

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Scientific Methodology

Background:

  • Construct validity, as conceptualized by Cronbach and Meehl (1955), remains a cornerstone of psychological measurement.
  • Understanding construct validity is crucial for interpreting research findings accurately.
  • The dynamic nature of construct validity necessitates ongoing evaluation and refinement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the current state and future directions in the understanding of construct validity.
  • To emphasize that fit indices should support, not replace, genuine understanding.
  • To address the challenges in interpreting study failures and the role of cognitive biases.

Main Methods:

  • The article reviews existing literature and theoretical frameworks on construct validity.
  • It discusses the interpretation of empirical evidence in relation to theoretical constructs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The role of quantitative metrics in scientific judgment is examined.

    • Main Results:

    • Construct validity is an ongoing process, not a static attribute.
    • Fit indices are tools to aid understanding, not definitive proofs.
    • Cognitive biases can significantly influence the interpretation of research outcomes.
    • Quantitative indices offer a more objective evaluation than qualitative judgments.

    Conclusions:

    • Researchers must use fit indices judiciously to enhance, not substitute, scientific understanding.
    • Awareness of cognitive biases is essential when interpreting evidence related to construct validity.
    • Quantitative methods provide a more reliable approach to evaluating constructs and measures.