Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Deconstructing, reconstructing, preserving Paul E. Meehl's legacy of construct validity
Brendan A Maher1, Irving I Gottesman
1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. bam@wjh.harvard.edu
Abstract:
The question of the status of cause-and-effect explanations of human behavior that posit physically existing causative factors and those that, on the other hand, posit hypothetical entities in the form of "useful fictions" has a long history. The influence of the works of Jeremy Bentham and Hans Vaihinger, as well as the later influence of Francis Galton, is described. Issues of the validity of hypothetical constructs and related problems of measurement and definition as found in psychoanalytic theory construction and in trait theory are examined. The significant and continuing interest generated by the landmark studies of K. MacCorquodale and P. E. Meehl (1948) and L. J. Cronbach and P. E. Meehl (1955) as well as the central importance of P. E. Meehl's thinking are described.
Related Concept Videos
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Reliability and Validity
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Plastic Deformations
Prismatic Beams: Problem Solving
The design begins with analyzing the beam as a free body to identify moments and force balances, thereby determining support reactions. Next, the designer...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...