Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Uncovering the problem-solving process: cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting.

Tamara van Gog1, Fred Paas, Jeroen J G van Merriënboer

  • 1Educational Technology Expertise Center, Open University of The Netherlands, Heerlen, Netherlands. tamara.vangog@ou.nl

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|January 6, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accelerometer-derived movement phenotypes and adolescent mental health in pediatric obesity: A causal machine-learning study.

International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP·2026
Same author

Learners' perceptions of the medical pause: cognitive load and team performance.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Student engagement profiles in a mobile app: Links to self-regulated learning and performance.

Educational technology research and development : ETR & D·2026
Same author

AI-driven complex systems redefine cognitive science.

Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.))·2026
Same author

Feasibility and exploratory cognitive outcomes of three exercise modalities in oldest-old adults in assisted living facilities: A 24-week pilot randomized controlled trial.

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

Timing of MVPA and psychosocial outcomes in adolescents with overweight/obesity.

International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP·2026

Concurrent and cued retrospective reporting methods effectively capture more problem-solving process information than retrospective reporting alone. These techniques enhance the understanding of cognitive processes during tasks like electrical troubleshooting.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Educational Technology

Background:

  • Understanding problem-solving processes is crucial for designing effective learning environments and user interfaces.
  • Traditional reporting methods like retrospective reporting may not fully capture the nuances of cognitive processes during complex tasks.
  • Investigating different think-aloud protocols is essential for optimizing data collection in cognitive research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of concurrent, retrospective, and cued retrospective reporting in eliciting problem-solving process information.
  • To determine which reporting methods best capture 'action,' 'why,' 'how,' and 'metacognitive' information during troubleshooting tasks.
  • To evaluate the impact of using task-based cues (eye fixations, mouse operations) on retrospective reporting accuracy.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • A within-participants design was employed with 26 participants performing electrical circuit troubleshooting tasks.
  • Participants utilized three reporting conditions: concurrent, retrospective, and cued retrospective reporting.
  • Cued retrospective reporting incorporated a superimposed record of eye fixations and mouse-keyboard operations as memory aids.

Main Results:

  • Cued retrospective reporting yielded more 'action,' 'how,' and 'metacognitive' information compared to retrospective reporting.
  • Concurrent reporting elicited more 'action' and 'why' information than retrospective reporting.
  • Retrospective reporting alone was less effective in capturing detailed problem-solving process information across all categories.

Conclusions:

  • Cued retrospective reporting offers a significant improvement over traditional retrospective methods for capturing cognitive process data.
  • Concurrent reporting is also effective, particularly for 'why' information, but may impact task performance.
  • Combining task-based cues with retrospective reporting enhances the richness of elicited problem-solving information.