Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

09:31
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty without stem extensions for the valgus knee
John A Anderson1, Andrea Baldini, James H MacDonald
1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA. sculcot@hss.edu
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|January 6, 2006
Summary
Constrained condylar knee implants without stem extensions provide excellent midterm outcomes for severe knee deformities. This approach reduces surgical invasiveness and complications, improving patient function and pain relief.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Engineering
Background:
- Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) traditionally uses stem extensions, which can increase operative time, cost, and invasiveness.
- Stem extensions may also lead to complications like end-of-stem pain and complicate revision surgeries.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the midterm efficacy and safety of constrained condylar knee implants without stem extensions in primary TKA for severely deformed knees.
- To assess the rate of aseptic loosening and functional outcomes in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 70 primary constrained condylar knee implants without stem extensions (1998-2001) in 61 patients with severe valgus deformity (≥15 degrees).
- Follow-up of 55 knees in 49 patients for an average of 44.5 months.
- Outcome assessment using the Knee Society scoring system.
Main Results:
- Significant improvement in Knee Society and functional scores (from 34/40 to 93/74 points).
- No radiographic evidence of loosening or wear was observed.
- No cases of peroneal nerve palsy, flexion instability, or medial instability; one case of chronic patellar dislocation.
Conclusions:
- Constrained condylar knee implants without stem extensions offer effective pain relief and functional improvement in patients with severe valgus knee deformities.
- This technique demonstrates a low complication rate and no aseptic loosening at midterm follow-up, suggesting it is a viable alternative to stemmed implants.