Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distances appear different on hills.

Jeanine K Stefanucci1, Dennis R Proffitt, Tom Banton

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4400, USA. jks8s@virginia.edu

Perception & Psychophysics
|January 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of Interpupillary Distance Mismatch on Distance and Orientation Perception in Action Space Across HMDs.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Registered Report: A Replication Examining Occupational Experience and Performance on the Water-Level Task.

Psychological science·2026
Same author

Examining differences in navigation strategy and performance in children, adolescents, and adults using the dual solution paradigm.

Neuropsychologia·2025
Same author

Test-retest reliability of visual and self-motion cue combination during navigation: Accuracy, variability, and cue weighting.

Spatial cognition and computation·2025
Same author

Assessing visuospatial perception in clinical and healthy populations: Test-retest reliability and smallest real difference of hill steepness estimation and the distance-on-hill task in virtual reality.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Integration of auditory and self-motion cues in spatial navigation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Increased physical effort, like carrying a heavy backpack, makes people overestimate distances on hills. This challenges the idea that only visual geometry determines perceived spatial layout.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Perception Science
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Increased physical effort is known to alter spatial perception, making hills seem steeper and distances longer.
  • Previous research suggests effort influences how individuals perceive their environment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether increased physical effort associated with traversing hills leads to an overestimation of distances.
  • To contrast the effort hypothesis with the traditional view that distance perception relies solely on optical and oculomotor cues.

Main Methods:

  • Distance estimation tasks were conducted on both steep hills and flat terrains.
  • Experiments were performed in both natural and virtual reality environments to assess perception across different settings.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Participants consistently overestimated distances on steep uphill and downhill slopes compared to equivalent distances on flat ground.
  • The findings indicate that effort plays a significant role in judging spatial distances.

Conclusions:

  • Perception of spatial layout is not solely determined by environmental geometry.
  • The results provide support for the effort hypothesis, suggesting physical exertion influences distance perception.