Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy.

Gregory O Gibson1, James C Craig

  • 1Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. gogibson@indiana.edu

Perception & Psychophysics
|January 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptual constancy of texture roughness in the tactile system.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2011
Same author

Dual pathways for haptic and visual perception of spatial and texture information.

NeuroImage·2011
Same author

Neural mechanisms of tactile motion integration in somatosensory cortex.

Neuron·2011
Same author

Shape invariant coding of motion direction in somatosensory cortex.

PLoS biology·2010
Same author

Aging and tactile temporal order.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2010
Same author

Convergence of submodality-specific input onto neurons in primary somatosensory cortex.

Journal of neurophysiology·2009
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

The gap detection task effectively measures tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy. Sensitivity varies by hand location and is linked to nerve fiber density, with spatial tasks revealing anisotropy.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Somatosensation
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy are crucial aspects of somatosensation.
  • Existing measures for tactile spatial perception have limitations.
  • Understanding the mechanisms of tactile anisotropy is an ongoing research area.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the gap detection task as a measure of tactile spatial sensitivity.
  • To assess the gap detection task's utility in measuring tactile anisotropy.
  • To investigate the relationship between tactile sensitivity, location, and innervation density.

Main Methods:

  • Tactile sensitivity was measured using a gap detection task on the fingerpad, fingerbase, and palm, with and without a latex glove.
  • Anisotropy was examined using gap detection, grating orientation, and smooth-grooved tasks across different body locations (index finger, palm, arm).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Innervation density of primary afferent fibers was correlated with sensitivity measures.

    • Main Results:

    • Tactile sensitivity varied significantly across different hand locations and correlated with innervation density.
    • A latex glove moderately affected sensitivity in the gap detection task.
    • Anisotropy was detected by spatial tasks (gap detection, grating orientation) but not by the intensive smooth-grooved task.
    • Differences in spatial sensitivity between proximal-distal and lateral-medial orientations were location-dependent, reaching up to a 2.35/1 ratio.

    Conclusions:

    • The gap detection task is a valid measure for assessing tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy.
    • Tactile anisotropy appears to be primarily driven by spatial processing mechanisms.
    • Location-specific differences in tactile perception are influenced by underlying neural structures and processing.