Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The relation between auditory temporal interval processing and sequential stream segregation examined with stimulus

Susan E Boehnke1, Dennis P Phillips

  • 1Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. susan@biomed.queensu.ca

Perception & Psychophysics
|January 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Parkinson's disease participant-led research: Towards neuroimaging-assisted deep brain stimulation programming.

Journal of Parkinson's disease·2025
Same author

Parkinson's disease participant-led research on the impact of deep brain stimulation frequency.

Journal of Parkinson's disease·2025
Same author

Principles and Priorities for Responsible Innovation in Neurotechnology for Canada - ERRATUM.

The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques·2025
Same author

Amiodarone induced movement disorder after cardiac arrest - A case report.

Resuscitation plus·2022
Same author

Characterization of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers associated with neurodegenerative diseases in healthy cynomolgus and rhesus macaque monkeys.

Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)·2022
Same author

Building communication neurotechnology for high stakes communications.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2021
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Laterality differences in noise bursts impact temporal processing. Ear-of-entry and interaural level differences (ILD) significantly affect objective and subjective measures, unlike interaural time differences (ITD).

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Temporal interval processing is crucial for auditory perception.
  • Laterality cues, such as interaural differences, influence auditory stream segregation and temporal organization.
  • Understanding how different laterality cues affect objective and subjective temporal processing is key to auditory scene analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of laterality differences in noise bursts on temporal interval processing and stream segregation.
  • To compare the effects of ear-of-entry, interaural level differences (ILD), and interaural time differences (ITD) on objective and subjective auditory measures.

Main Methods:

  • Objective measures: gap detection and temporal asymmetry detection thresholds.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjective measure: stream segregation.
  • Stimuli: Noise bursts with varying laterality cues (ear-of-entry, ILD, ITD).

    • Main Results:

    • Objective thresholds were strongly affected by ear-of-entry differences and moderately by ILD differences.
    • ITD differences did not significantly affect objective thresholds.
    • Stream segregation was effective based on ear-of-entry and ILD differences, but not ITD differences.

    Conclusions:

    • Perceptual segregation relies more on differential peripheral activation (ear-of-entry) than perceived laterality.
    • Auditory system processing of laterality cues varies depending on the type of cue (ear-of-entry, ILD, ITD).
    • Findings suggest distinct neural pathways for processing different types of interaural information for temporal perception.