Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
On estimation of the variance in Cochran-Armitage trend tests for genetic association using case-control studies
Gang Zheng1, Joseph L Gastwirth
1Office of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. zhengg@nhlbi.nih.gov
Abstract:
The Cochran-Armitage trend test has been used in case-control studies for testing genetic association. As the variance of the test statistic is a function of unknown parameters, e.g. disease prevalence and allele frequency, it must be estimated. The usual estimator combining data for cases and controls assumes they follow the same distribution under the null hypothesis. Under the alternative hypothesis, however, the cases and controls follow different distributions. Thus, the power of the trend tests may be affected by the variance estimator used. In particular, the usual method combining both cases and controls is not an asymptotically unbiased estimator of the null variance when the alternative is true. Two different estimates of the null variance are available which are consistent under both the null and alternative hypotheses. In this paper, we examine sample size and small sample power performance of trend tests, which are optimal for three common genetic models as well as a robust trend test based on the three estimates of the variance and provide guidelines for choosing an appropriate test.
Related Concept Videos
Cochran's Q Test
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...