Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Factors influencing inclusion of patients with malignancies in clinical trials
Caroline Tournoux1, Sandrine Katsahian, Sylvie Chevret
1Department of Biostatistics, Hospital Saint Louis, APHP, Paris, France.
Abstract:
Participation in clinical trials remains low and is a central issue in oncology. The authors identified, through a systematic review, 75 papers published up to August 2004 that report barriers to recruitment of patients in clinical trials. These barriers range from patient preference and concern about information/consent to clinical problems with protocols. Strategies to overcome barriers on the part of patients and clinicians are needed and should be carefully evaluated. Thirty-three (44%) papers reported factors related to patients as influencing the inclusion of patients, 28 (37%) reported clinician's related factors, and 37 (49%) other factors from either specific groups of patients (30 papers, 40%) and/or other scopes (13 papers, 17%). No differences in prevalence were found between papers dedicated to hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Factors related to clinicians as influential were more frequently reported before 1995 (70%) than thereafter (25%; P = 0.0009). Reporting specific groups of patients as influential was more frequent in North American articles (50%) than in others (14%, P = 0.008). Patients' barriers included mostly patient preference (12 papers), concern about information and/or consent (11 papers), worry about uncertainty (7 papers), and/or relationship with medical team (7 papers). Concerning clinicians, incompatibility of protocol with normal practice (nine papers), problems in complying with the protocol (eight papers), and/or consent procedure (eight papers) were the most reported factors. The remaining factors mostly relied on specific groups of patients (30 papers), notably age of patients (18 papers) and/or minority population (11 papers, all from the USA). Strategies to overcome these barriers are needed and should be carefully evaluated.
Insights
Low patient participation in oncology clinical trials stems from patient preferences, consent concerns, and protocol issues. Addressing these barriers requires targeted strategies for both patients and clinicians to improve trial recruitment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Patient participation in clinical trials is a significant challenge in oncology.
- Low recruitment rates hinder the advancement of cancer treatments and research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and identify barriers to patient recruitment in oncology clinical trials.
- To categorize these barriers based on patient-related, clinician-related, and other factors.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of 75 papers published up to August 2004 was conducted.
- Barriers were analyzed and categorized based on their source (patient, clinician, other) and specific nature.
Main Results:
- Patient-related factors (44%) included preference, information/consent concerns, and uncertainty. Clinician-related factors (37%) involved protocol incompatibility and consent procedures.
- Other factors (49%) frequently cited specific patient groups, such as age and minority populations, particularly in North American studies.
- Clinician-related factors were reported more frequently in papers published before 1995.
Conclusions:
- Patient and clinician-related factors significantly impede oncology clinical trial recruitment.
- Addressing barriers like patient preferences, consent issues, and protocol complexities is crucial.
- Developing and evaluating targeted strategies is essential to enhance patient enrollment in clinical trials.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Cancer Survival Analysis
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...