Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
[Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement versus bypass operation in symptomatic multiple-vessel
B L van der Hoeven1, M J Schalij, E E van der Wall
1Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, afd. Hartziekten, CS-P28, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden.
Insights
Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) showed better 3-year survival than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting, especially for complex coronary artery disease. CABG is recommended for patients with multiple-vessel disease involving the proximal LAD, reduced heart function, or diabetes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Context:
- Comparison of revascularization strategies for coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Observational study assessing long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- Focus on patients with complex CAD, including triple-vessel disease and involvement of the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD).
Purpose:
- To compare the 3-year survival rates between PCI with stenting and CABG in a large patient cohort.
- To identify specific patient subgroups who benefit more from one revascularization strategy over the other.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for optimal treatment selection in complex CAD.
Summary:
- The study found significantly better 3-year survival following CABG compared to PCI with stenting.
- This survival benefit was most pronounced in patients with triple-vessel disease and those with two-vessel disease affecting the proximal LAD.
- Potential reasons include more complete revascularization and bypassing of future lesions with CABG.
Impact:
- Suggests CABG may be the preferred revascularization strategy for symptomatic patients with multiple-vessel CAD, particularly those with proximal LAD involvement, reduced left ventricular function, or diabetes mellitus.
- Informs clinical decision-making for interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons managing complex coronary artery disease.
- Highlights the importance of considering the extent and location of coronary artery disease when choosing between PCI and CABG.
Abstract:
In a large observational study comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using stent implantation with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), 3-year survival was better after CABG than after PCI with stenting. This was particularly true in patients with triple-vessel disease, and for patients with two-vessel disease with involvement ofthe proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD). Potential explanations for this finding are that with CABG 'future' culprit lesions are bypassed or that CABG allows a more complete revascularization. Based on the results of this study, the CABG procedure is preferable in those patients with symptomatic multiple-vessel disease with involvement of the proximal LAD, especially if they have accompanying reduced left ventricular function or diabetes mellitus.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction