Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Numerical order and quantity processing in number comparison.

Eva Turconi1, Jamie I D Campbell, Xavier Seron

  • 1Unité de Neurosciences Cognitives, Université Catholique de Louvain, Place Cardinal Mercier, 10, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. eva.turconi@psp.ucl.ac.be

Cognition
|January 10, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reading direction and spatial effects in parity and arithmetic tasks.

Psychological research·2020
Same author

What is learned in procedural learning? The case of alphabet arithmetic.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2019
Same author

Evidence for a retrieval over a sum counting theory of adults' simple addition.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2019
Same author

Recruitment of the occipital cortex by arithmetic processing follows computational bias in the congenitally blind.

NeuroImage·2018
Same author

Does the min-counting strategy for simple addition become automatized in educated adults? A behavioural and ERP study of the size congruency effect.

Neuropsychologia·2018
Same author

Detecting over-reporting of symptoms: the French version of the self-report symptom inventory.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2018
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Numerical quantity and order judgments involve distinct cognitive mechanisms. Magnitude comparison tasks may incorporate order-related processes, affecting numerical distance effects.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Numerical Cognition

Background:

  • Understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying numerical cognition is crucial.
  • The relationship between processing numerical quantity and numerical order is not fully understood.
  • Existing research often assumes distinct processes for magnitude comparison and order judgments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the distinct cognitive mechanisms involved in processing numerical order information.
  • To examine the relationship between numerical order processing and numerical quantity processing.
  • To determine if magnitude comparison tasks are a process-pure measure of numerical representation.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted comparing performance on quantity-comparison and relative-order judgment tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants judged which of two numbers was larger (quantity task) or if a sequence was ascending/descending (order task).
  • Analysis focused on reaction times and accuracy, particularly examining distance and order effects.

    • Main Results:

    • The quantity-comparison task showed a standard distance effect, but it was smaller for ascending than descending pairs.
    • The order task revealed a pair-order effect (faster for ascending pairs) and a reverse distance effect for consecutive ascending pairs.
    • These findings suggest distinct cognitive mechanisms for quantity and order judgments, with order influencing quantity processing.

    Conclusions:

    • Numerical quantity and order judgments recruit different cognitive mechanisms.
    • Order-related processes appear to be involved in magnitude comparison, as evidenced by the reduced distance effect for ascending pairs.
    • Distance effects in quantity-comparison tasks may not solely reflect magnitude representation but can be influenced by order processing.