Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
[Effect of bonding materials and methods on microleakage around the edge of stainless-steel brackets: an in vitro
Zheng-ming Li1, Si-han Chen, Xin-qiang Liu
1Department of Dentistry, Nanshan People's Hospital of Shenzhen City, China. lizhm2000@yahoo.com.cn
Purpose:
To observe and compare the effect of different types of adhesive materials and different types of etching methods on microleakage around bonded metal brackets.
Methods:
36 healthy premolars extracted for orthodontic reason were selected in the study. The samples were divided into three groups, 12 in each. Group A was etched with 37% phosphate and bonded with Jingjin adhesive; Group B was with 37% phosphate+3M Transbond; Group C was self-etching primer+3M Transbond. All samples were thermalcycled for 500 times, then put into 1% methylenum solution for 24 hours. Microleakage of samples was observed under stereomicroscope. Multiple comparison and Student t test were used for the comparison of data samples(alpha=0.05).
Results:
(1) Significant difference of microleakage was found among three groups (F=22.462, P<0.01); Multiple comparison showed no significant difference between Group A and Group B (P>0.05), significant differences of microleakage were found between group A and C (P<0.05), group B and C (P<0.05), respectively. (2) Significant differences between occlusal microleakage and gingival microleakage were found in group A (P<0.05), group B (P<0.01) and group C (P<0.01), respectively.
Conclusions:
(1) The type of adhesive had no effect on microleakage. (2)Different etching methods are relevant to microleakage, the microleakage of self-etching groups is much more than that of phosphate-etching groups. (3) Gingival microleakage is significantly larger than occlusal microleakage.