Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Robust genomic control for association studies.

Gang Zheng1, Boris Freidlin, Joseph L Gastwirth

  • 1Office of Biostatistics Research, Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. zhengg@nhlbi.nih.gov

American Journal of Human Genetics
|January 10, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changing standard of care during a randomized trial: examples, considerations and guidelines.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Molecular Profiling for Precision Oncology: Moving Beyond Feasibility and Safety.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

A note on rank-preserving structural failure time models to account for crossover.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Evaluating the impact of stratification on the power and cross-arm balance of randomized phase 2 clinical trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2025
Same author

Accrual Suspensions in Seamless Phase II/III Trials: A Review of NRG Oncology Trials.

JCO oncology advances·2025
Same author

Non-inferiority trials: tyranny or good governance?

The Lancet. Oncology·2025
Same journal

Linkage disequilibrium and allelic heterogeneity explain variation in coronary artery disease risk at 9p21 across populations and reduced effect in Africans.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Genome-wide association study and predictors of neonatal blood cell traits in Hispanic newborns.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of methods for assessing effects of risk factors on disease progression in Mendelian randomization under index event bias.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Deciding "what" to screen for and "when": The importance of natural history information.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Homologous recombination deficiency-driven genomic instability in ovarian cancer as an indicator of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Individuals who deviate from polygenic expectation are enriched for damaging variants in genes linked to rare disease.

American journal of human genetics·2026
See all related articles

Genomic control methods help prevent false positives in genetic association studies. A new robust genomic control test effectively adjusts for population stratification and cryptic relatedness, maintaining accuracy in genetic analyses.

Area of Science:

  • Population genetics
  • Statistical genetics
  • Genomic association studies

Background:

  • Population-based case-control studies are vital for genetic association testing.
  • Population stratification and cryptic relatedness can lead to inflated false-positive rates in genetic analyses.
  • Existing genomic control methods effectively adjust the Cochran-Armitage trend test for known genetic models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a robust genomic control method for genotype-based chi-squared (χ²) association tests when the genetic model is unknown.
  • To address the limitations of existing genomic control formulas for 2-degree-of-freedom tests.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes expressing the 2-df genotype-based chi-squared (χ²) test as two Cochran-Armitage trend tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Genomic control is applied separately to each of these trend tests.
  • The properties of the resulting adjusted 2-df test are examined through simulation.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed robust genomic control method effectively controls the type I error rate.
    • The adjusted 2-df test demonstrates reasonable statistical power compared to model-specific optimal tests.
    • This method provides a reliable approach for genetic association studies with unknown inheritance modes.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed genomic control-adjusted 2-df test is a robust tool for population-based genetic association studies.
    • It successfully mitigates issues arising from population stratification and cryptic relatedness.
    • This method enhances the reliability of genetic association findings when the mode of inheritance is not predetermined.