Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Compensating workers for permanent partial disabilities.

Peter S Barth1

  • 1University of Connecticut, USA.

Social Security Bulletin
|January 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Applying Aspects of Disability Determination Methods from the Netherlands in the United States.

Social security bulletin·2026
Same journal

Hispanics' Knowledge of Social Security: New Evidence.

Social security bulletin·2025
Same journal

Youth transitioning out of foster care: an evaluation of a Supplemental Security Income policy change.

Social security bulletin·2013
Same journal

Pension plan participation among married couples.

Social security bulletin·2013
Same journal

Disability shocks near retirement age and financial well-being.

Social security bulletin·2013
Same journal

Prevalence, characteristics, and poverty status of Supplemental Security Income multirecipients.

Social security bulletin·2013

State workers' compensation laws vary significantly in permanent partial disability benefits. This leads to different benefit amounts for similar injuries, indicating no single "best practice" exists.

Area of Science:

  • Workers' Compensation Law
  • Disability Benefits
  • Economic Analysis of Law

Background:

  • State workers' compensation laws exhibit considerable variation in benefit provision for permanent partial disabilities.
  • These variations create disparities in compensation for workers with comparable injuries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the different approaches states use to classify and compensate permanent partial disabilities.
  • To highlight the impact of these differing approaches on benefit amounts and potential disputes.

Main Methods:

  • Classification of state workers' compensation laws into four basic groupings based on benefit determination approaches.
  • Comparative analysis of benefit levels across different state approaches for similar permanent partial disabilities.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Substantial variability exists in benefit amounts for permanent partial disabilities across states.
  • Workers with identical injuries can receive significantly different compensation depending on the state's legal framework.
  • The approach to determining benefits directly influences the nature and frequency of disputes.

Conclusions:

  • The diverse approaches to compensating permanent partial disabilities suggest a lack of a universally accepted
  • best practice
  • among states.
  • Continued differences in state laws indicate ongoing challenges in establishing equitable and consistent benefit systems.