Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Focusing strength and a subjective method for determining refraction].

N M Sergienko, R L Timoshchuk

    Vestnik Oftalmologii
    |January 13, 2006
    PubMed
    Summary

    Subjective refractometry results were re-evaluated considering natural eye focusing strength. This correction significantly shifted refractive error distributions, revealing a higher prevalence of emmetropia in clinical practice.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Aberrometry of a new artificial implanted lenses model with changeable refractive surface].

    Likars'ka sprava·2014
    Same author

    [Aberrometry results of a new IOL model with variable refractive surface].

    Vestnik oftalmologii·2014
    Same author

    Capsule fixation device for cataract surgery.

    European journal of ophthalmology·2009
    Same author

    Depth of focus: clinical manifestation.

    European journal of ophthalmology·2007
    Same author

    Accommodative function of eyes in persons exposed to ionizing radiation.

    Ophthalmic research·2002
    Same author

    [Micro-trephination of the limbus in neovascular glaucoma].

    Vestnik oftalmologii·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Vision Science

    Background:

    • Subjective refractometry is a standard method for determining refractive error.
    • The classical method assumes a schematic eye with no inherent focusing strength.
    • Recent data suggest the human eye typically possesses focusing strength exceeding 0.5 diopters, potentially impacting refractometry accuracy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To re-evaluate clinical refraction distributions by incorporating the eye's natural focusing strength into subjective refractometry.
    • To assess the impact of correcting for inherent ocular focusing power on refractive error classification.

    Main Methods:

    • A subjective refractometry method using trial lenses was employed on 374 eyes under natural accommodation.
    • Refraction data were analyzed with and without considering the eye's inherent focusing strength (using +0.25 D or +0.5 D lenses).
    • Visual acuity was maintained at 1.0 or higher, indicating vision retention through focusing strength rather than solely accommodation.

    Main Results:

    • Initial subjective refraction revealed: hypermetropia (43.6%), emmetropia (30.8%), myopia (12.8%), and astigmatism (12.8%).
    • After accounting for the eye's focusing strength, the distribution shifted significantly: emmetropia (73.0%), myopia (12.8%), astigmatism (12.8%), and hypermetropia (1.4%).
    • The correction demonstrated that eyes with good visual acuity maintain vision by utilizing inherent focusing strength.

    Conclusions:

    • The typical assumption of a non-focusing schematic eye in subjective refractometry may lead to inaccurate refractive error classification.
    • Incorporating the eye's natural focusing strength provides a more accurate representation of refractive error distributions in the population.
    • This adjusted method highlights a higher prevalence of emmetropia than previously reported by classical subjective methods.

    Related Experiment Videos