Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

08:57
VacuSIP, an Improved InEx Method for In Situ Measurement of Particulate and Dissolved Compounds Processed by Active Suspension Feeders
Published on: August 3, 2016
Filter-feeding dabbling ducks (Anas spp.) can actively select particles by size.
1Department of Biological Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6. dgurd@sfu.ca
Summary
Dabbling ducks (Anas spp.) use bill lamellar separation, not just spacing, to actively select prey size. This mechanism allows them to partition food resources and avoid less preferred items, impacting foraging strategies.
Area of Science:
- Ornithology
- Animal Behavior
- Functional Morphology
Background:
- Filter-feeding dabbling ducks (Anas spp.) exhibit poorly understood relationships between bill structure, feeding function, and prey selection.
- Interspecific variation in duck bill morphology may influence prey retention and resource partitioning, but the exact mechanisms are unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether interspecific differences in duck bill morphology affect prey retention, enabling resource partitioning.
- To test the hypotheses that prey retention is solely determined by interlamellar distance or if lamellar separation plays a role in selective particle expulsion.
Main Methods:
- Experimental feeding trials with three dabbling duck species using mixed seed types (millet, wheat, poppy) of varying sizes.
- Analysis of seed ingestion proportions compared to unmixed foraging rates to infer selective feeding behaviors.
Main Results:
- Ducks ingested a higher proportion of preferred large seeds (millet, wheat) over smaller, less preferred seeds (poppy), even when all exceeded interlamellar distance.
- Ingestion proportions differed significantly from expected rates based on unmixed prey, indicating active avoidance of poppy seeds.
- Results support the lamellar separation hypothesis and refute the sole role of interlamellar distance in prey retention.
Conclusions:
- Dabbling ducks actively select prey size using lamellar separation, not solely relying on fixed interlamellar distance.
- Lamellar separation allows for selective expulsion of unwanted particles, facilitating prey partitioning.
- A potential trade-off exists between particle size selection (via lamellar separation) and ingestion rate, influencing interspecific resource partitioning.

