Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis of jumping/falling distance from a height.

F Wischhusen1, S Patra, M Braumann

  • 1Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Hamburg, Butenfeld 34, 22529 Hamburg, Germany. wischhus@uke.uni-hamburg.de

Forensic Science International
|January 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Active jumps achieved significantly greater distances (3.7-7.1 m) compared to passive jumps (1.0-3.4 m) from a 5m height. Jump trajectory closely matched parabolic motion, enabling distance predictions for higher jumps.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Observation of the Radiative Decay D_{s0}^{*}(2317)^{+}→D_{s}^{*+}γ.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Search for B→X_{s}νν[over ¯] Decays.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Search for Feebly Interacting Particles in B Decays with Missing Energy at Belle.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Search for B^{0}→K^{*0}τ^{+}τ^{-} Decays at the Belle II Experiment.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for a Dark Higgs Boson Produced in Association with Inelastic Dark Matter at the Belle II Experiment.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Study of χ_{bJ}(2P)→ωϒ(1S) at Belle.

Physical review letters·2025

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Movement Analysis
  • Physics of Sports

Background:

  • Understanding jump mechanics is crucial for optimizing athletic performance.
  • Previous models often simplify the complex physics of human jumping.
  • Distinguishing between active and passive jump contributions requires detailed kinematic analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the kinematic motion of jumps from a 5m height.
  • To compare jumping distances between active and passive jump mechanisms.
  • To validate the parabolic trajectory model for free-flight domains and extrapolate predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Kinematic motion analysis of 50 jumps from a 5m platform.
  • Measurement of jumping distances for passive and active jump conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of jump trajectories with the parabolic model of an inclined throw.

    • Main Results:

    • Distinguishable maxima in jumping distances were observed: passive jumps (1.0-3.4 m) and active jumps (3.7-7.1 m).
    • Variations in 'take-off' parameters had minimal impact on jumping distances.
    • The 'free-flight' trajectory closely matched the parabolic model, validating its applicability.

    Conclusions:

    • Active jumping significantly enhances distance compared to passive jumping.
    • The parabolic motion model accurately describes the free-flight phase of jumps.
    • The findings allow for extrapolation and prediction of jump distances from greater heights (up to 20m).