Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing.

Antony J Hodgson1, Kevin B Inkpen, Mark Shekhman

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ahodgson@mech.ubc.ca

Computer Aided Surgery : Official Journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery
|January 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does applying CPAK classification boundaries using measurements from a surgical navigation system result in different class distributions? A retrospective assessment.

Journal of experimental orthopaedics·2026
Same author

Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship After Conversion of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing to Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

JBJS reviews·2026
Same author

First Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Instability: 10-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors Associated With Rerevision.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Diagnosis of aseptic loosening after hip arthroplasty : international Delphi consensus.

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Give the Cefazolin, Even in Patients with a Cephalosporin Allergy: Commentary on an article by Josef E. Jolissaint, MD, et al.: " Cefazolin and the R1 Side Chain. Why Patients with a Cephalosporin Allergy Can Be Safely Given Cefazolin While Undergoing Joint Arthroplasty ".

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

Survivorship of Cemented versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Same Contemporary Design: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) for femoral head resurfacing offers improved implant accuracy for younger patients compared to traditional mechanical jigs. This technique reduces variability in implant placement without increasing operative time, enhancing surgical outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Surgical Navigation

Background:

  • Femoral head resurfacing is a viable alternative to total hip replacement for younger patients.
  • Current mechanical jigs for femoral head resurfacing lead to significant implant placement variability and prolonged operative times.
  • Minimizing implant malposition is crucial for the long-term success of hip resurfacing procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a novel computer-assisted surgical (CAS) technique for femoral head resurfacing.
  • To assess the potential of CAS to reduce implant placement variability compared to traditional mechanical jigs.
  • To determine if CAS impacts operative time in femoral head resurfacing.

Main Methods:

  • A new CAS technique for femoral head resurfacing was developed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A cadaver study involving five paired femurs was conducted.
  • Implant placement accuracy (varus/valgus variability and version) and operative time were compared between the CAS technique and a standard mechanical jig.
  • Main Results:

    • The CAS technique, even with a novice surgeon, significantly reduced varus/valgus implant variability (2° SD) compared to the mechanical jig (5° SD) used by an expert.
    • The mechanical jig resulted in significantly retroverted implant placement.
    • No significant difference in operative time was observed between the CAS technique and the mechanical jig.

    Conclusions:

    • Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) provides superior accuracy in femoral head resurfacing implant placement compared to mechanical jigs.
    • CAS can mitigate implant variability and malversion, potentially improving patient outcomes.
    • The developed CAS technique is efficient, showing no increase in operative time.