Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Glycaemic control with modified intensive insulin injections (MII) using insulin pens and premixed insulin in
Ashraf T Soliman1, Magdi Omar, Mostafa M Rizk
1Department of Pediatrics, Alexandria University Children's Hospital, El-Chatby, Alexandria, Egypt. ATSOLIMAN@yahoo.com
Insights
Modified intensified insulin therapy (MII) in children with type 1 diabetes improves glycemic control using insulin pens without increasing insulin dosage. This approach offers better blood glucose management compared to conventional therapy, potentially reducing complication risks.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Metabolic Disorders
- Diabetes Management
Background:
- Type 1 diabetes management in children requires effective strategies for glycemic control.
- Conventional insulin therapy may not always achieve optimal blood glucose levels.
- Insulin pens offer a convenient delivery method for intensified insulin regimens.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare glycemic control and insulin dosage in children with type 1 diabetes.
- To evaluate modified intensified insulin therapy (MII) using insulin pens against conventional insulin therapy.
- To assess the impact of MII on blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and total daily insulin dose.
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal, randomized controlled trial of 6 months or more.
- Two groups of children with type 1 diabetes were randomly selected: Group AI (n=20) on MII and Group B (n=20) on conventional therapy.
- Group AII (n=10) with recent diagnosis also received MII.
- Outcome measures included mean blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and total daily insulin dose.
Main Results:
- Children on MII showed significantly lower mean blood glucose concentrations compared to conventional therapy.
- Improved glycemic control with MII was achieved without a significant change in average daily insulin dose in Group AI.
- In Group AII, insulin dosage decreased significantly during the initial 6 months (honeymoon period).
Conclusions:
- Modified intensified insulin therapy using insulin pens and various insulin formulations provides superior glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes.
- This improved control is achievable without increasing insulin requirements.
- The findings suggest MII could reduce the risk of microvascular complications associated with type 1 diabetes.
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to compare glycemic control and insulin dosage in children with type 1 diabetes treated by a modified intensified insulin therapy MII using insulin pens (and premixed and regular insulin) with those on conventional insulin therapy. This was a longitudinal, randomized controlled trial for 6 months or more. From a cohort of 125 children with previously diagnosed type-1 diabetes (more than a year after diagnosis) two groups were randomly selected Group AI (n=20) and Group B (n=20). Group AI children and 10 children with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes (Group AII) were allocated to MII using regular insulin and premixed insulin (30/70 and 40/60 and 50/50). Group B patients continued their conventional insulin therapy for the whole period of the trial. The main outcome measures were glycemic control measured by mean blood glucose concentration and percentage of glycated haemoglobin and total daily insulin dose. Mean blood glucose concentrations before the three main meals, and at midnight, (148, 147, 179 and 127 mg/dl, respectively) were lower in children receiving intensified MII compared with those receiving conventional insulin therapy (192, 174, 194 and 179 mg/dl, respectively) (standardized mean difference 34+/-15 mg/dl), equivalent to a difference of 1.9+/-0.8 mmol/l. This improved control during MII was achieved with no change in the average daily insulin dose in group-AI. In group-AII insulin dose decreased significantly during their first 6 moths of treatment (honeymooning). Glycemic control is better during MII using insulin pens and premixed and regular insulin compared with conventional insulin therapy, without any significant change in insulin dose needed to achieve this level of control. The difference in glycemic control between the two methods is significant and could reduce the risk of micro-vascular complications.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into rapid-acting...
Type I Diabetes I: Introduction
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors